SHARE
COPY LINK

MONARCHY

Spain’s king and queen mark 20th wedding anniversary in new era for crown

Spain's King Felipe VI and Queen Letizia will celebrate their 20th wedding anniversary on Wednesday, widely credited with having regenerated the scandal-tainted monarchy for a new era.

Spain's king and queen mark 20th wedding anniversary in new era for crown
Past and present: Spain's King Felipe VI and Queen Letizia during their wedding celebrations 20 years ago, when Juan Carlos I (L) was still on the throne. (Photo by Pierre-Philippe MARCOU / AFP)

To mark the occasion the royals released over the weekend a series of previously unseen pictures of them posing along with their daughters, Princess Leonor, 18, and Princess Sofia, 17, in the gardens of Madrid’s royal palace. No public events are planned.

Felipe, then 36, exchanged vows and gold rings with Letizia Ortiz, a 31-year-old divorced journalist, at Madrid’s Almudena Cathedral on a rainy May 22, 2004 in a lavish ceremony attended by statesmen and royalty from around the world.

He became king – and Letizia Spain’s first commoner queen – after his father, Juan Carlos, abdicated in June 2014 following a series of scandals over his finances and love life which caused the popularity of the royal family to plunge.

Adding to the monarchy’s woes, Felipe’s elder sister, Princess Cristina, was indicted on tax fraud charges. She was later acquitted.

“The crown was in crisis, and they turned things around during these 10 years,” Javier Ayuso, who headed the royal palace’s communications departments between 2012 and 2014, told AFP.

Pilar Eyre, the author of a series of books about the monarchy, said Felipe and Letizia “found the crown in a deplorable state”.

“Everyone was saying that they were not going to last and that the monarchy’s days were numbered,” she told AFP.

READ ALSO: How much do Spain’s king and royal family make?

‘Code of conduct’

The new king promptly ordered an audit of the royal household’s accounts and issued a “code of conduct” for its members.

Then in 2020 Felipe renounced any future personal inheritance he might receive from his father and stripped him of his annual allowance after fresh details of his allegedly shady dealings emerged.

Even though investigations of Juan Carlos’s finances in Spain and Switzerland have since been dropped, Felipe has continued to keep a distance from his father, who left Spain for Abu Dhabi in 2020.

The royal couple have also loosened protocol at most events to try to “bring the crown closer to the citizens,” said Ayuso.

The daughter of a nurse and the granddaughter of a taxi-driver, Letizia initially faced opposition from Spain’s most conservative factions when she married Felipe.

“It was a milestone in Spain’s contemporary history because no crown prince had ever married a person deemed unequal, that is not being royal,” José Antonio Zarzalejos, a royal expert and former director of the conservative daily newspaper ABC, told AFP.

Spain’s Queen Letizia, Crown Princess of Asturias Leonor, Princess Sofia and King Felipe VI pose during a visit of the “Jardines de Albabia” gardens on the island of Mallorca during their summer holidays in 2023. (Photo by JAIME REINA / AFP)

‘Breath of fresh air’

Felipe and Letizia dated in secret before their engagement was announced in November 2003.

But to her supporters, Letizia’s down-to-earth middle-class roots are an asset.

“She has brought one of the ingredients needed to maintain a monarchy: closeness to the people,” said Ayuso, adding that the queen has brought “a breath of fresh air to the crown”.

Since the royal couple’s eldest daughter Leonor turned 18 on October 31st last year, the public has increasingly turned its attention to the heir to the Spanish throne.

READ MORE: Leonor turns 18 – What you need to know about Spain’s crown princess

Leonor swore loyalty to the Spanish constitution that day during a nationally televised ceremony in the lower house of parliament, a necessary step for her to be able to succeed to the crown and someday become queen.

She has appeared frequently in the media lately along with the term “Leonormania,” underlining her growing popularity as the modern face of the future monarchy.

“The future of the Spanish monarchy now depends more on Leonor than on Letizia,” journalist Abel Hernandez, the author of several books on the royal family, told AFP.

READ ALSO: Why is Spain’s princess doing the military service?

Member comments

  1. Obviously, the person who wrote this article doesn’t know about the scandal of Letizia and her supposed lovers. There are two books out now. “Letizia y yo”, written by Jaime Burgos. There is another book written by a journalist, as well. I haven’t read them, nor will I read them. But, to say that she has regenerated the scandal-tainted monarchy is sort of laughable at this point. There is a lot on this in the Spanish press.

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

MONARCHY

UK judge throws out harassment case against Spain’s former king

A UK judge on Friday ruled that the former lover of Spain's exiled ex-king Juan Carlos I cannot bring a claim of harassment against him in the courts in London.

UK judge throws out harassment case against Spain's former king

Danish businesswoman Corinna zu Sayn-Wittgenstein-Sayn, who is in her late 50s and lives in England, sued Juan Carlos, 85, who abdicated in 2014, for damages of more than £126 million ($154 million) for personal injury.

She alleged that he caused her “great mental pain” by spying on and harassing her.

“The High Court of England and Wales lacks jurisdiction to try this claim,” judge Rowena Collins Rice said in a written judgment on the civil case brought by zu Sayn-Wittgenstein-Sayn.

“I was shown no authority coming anywhere near supporting an assumption of English jurisdiction over a foreign-domiciled defendant in such circumstances,” Collins Rice added.

At the same time, “she has not sufficiently established that the ‘harmful event’ of which she complains — harassment by the defendant — happened in England”, the judge ruled.

Corinna Sayn-Wittgenstein in 2015. (Photo by JP Yim / GETTY IMAGES NORTH AMERICA / Getty Images via AFP)
 

The judge recognised zu Sayn-Wittgenstein-Sayn “has an account she wishes to give of her personal and financial history with the defendant, and about the harm he has caused her peace of mind and personal wellbeing, and her business, social and family life”.

However, she added: “The only question for me has been whether the claimant can compel the defendant to give his side of the story to the High Court. My conclusion, as things stand, is that she cannot.”

Responding to the ruling, Zu Sayn-Wittgenstein-Sayn said she was “deeply disappointed” and that it was “disheartening to see that victims of harassment often struggle to find justice in our legal system”.

She added: “Intimidation and harassment of me and my children continues and is aimed at fully collapsing me.

“Juan Carlos has deployed his full armoury to grind me down and the reach of his power is immense.

“I am considering all options,” she added.

Juan Carlos, who is married, was in an “intimate romantic relationship” with the divorcee from 2004 to 2009 and showered her with gifts, according to previous court submissions.

Zu Sayn-Wittgenstein-Sayn alleged that Juan Carlos began harassing her after their relationship broke down, using threats, break-ins at her properties and surveillance.

Gunshots damaged security cameras at the front gate of her property, she alleged, accusing the former king of being angry at her refusals.

The couple’s relationship became known in 2012, when the monarch broke a hip while on holiday in Botswana with Zu Sayn-Wittgenstein-Sayn and had to be flown home, sparking public anger during a period of record unemployment in Spain.

Two years later, dogged by scandals and health problems, Juan Carlos abdicated at the age of 76 in favour of his son, Felipe VI, who has now publicly distanced himself from his father.

He went into self-imposed exile in the United Arab Emirates in 2020.

Three appeal judges in London in December ruled his ex-lover could not sue him for harassment in the English courts for the period while he was on the throne as he had immunity as sovereign.

But they left open the possibility that she could pursue him for his alleged behaviour after his abdication.

SHOW COMMENTS