SHARE
COPY LINK

HEALTH

Germans flout extra health insurance fees

About one million people have refused to pay additional fees levied by statutory health insurers this year to fill budgetary shortfalls, a media report said on Tuesday.

Germans flout extra health insurance fees
Photo: DPA

German law allows health insurers to charge customers extra fees when they can’t make do with the money doled out for each customer by the government’s central statutory health care fund. In early 2010, more than a dozen health insurers began charging their members such fees, which top out at €37.50 per month.

In March, hundreds of thousands of Germans reportedly began switching health insurers to avoid such fees, but some have apparently opted to simply not pay, according to a poll by daily Bild.

Depending on the health insurer, up to 30 percent of customers have not paid their share of the recent increases, the paper said.

Some 10 percent of the 4.6 million people covered by popular insurer DAK have yet to make the payment. And insurer KKH-Allianz still has outstanding payments from just over 10 percent of its insured.

The highest rate of failed payments belongs to BKK, where some 30 percent of customers have ignored the extra fees. Currently BKK is encouraging payment via letter and telephone, the company told Bild.

Germany’s public health care system instituted a new universal premium in January 2009. Set at 15.5 percent of an individual’s gross pay, it has turned out to be insufficient to cover the budgets of many of the country’s statutory insurers, thus the extra fees.

Switching insurers may not help customers avoid extra fees for long, though.

In March Health Minister Philipp Rösler said he plans to tack a monthly per capita premium of €29 on health insurance beginning in 2011 to make up for chronic deficits. The fee would be paid by every person who is publicly insured, meanwhile employers and employees would continue to pay equal parts of insurance fees.

According to Health Ministry estimations, public insurers face a deficit of around €11 billion for 2011 due to the flagging economy.

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.
For members

HEALTH

When can doctors in Denmark refuse to continue treating patients?

General Practitioners in Denmark have the right to break off a patient-doctor relationship in specific circumstances.

When can doctors in Denmark refuse to continue treating patients?

Although doctors in Denmark have the right to decide not to continue treating a patient – requiring them to find a new GP – the circumstances in which this can happen are limited, and must be approved by health authorities.

The frequency in which the circumstances arise is also low. A doctor decided to no longer receive a patient on 375 occasions in 2016, according to the medical professionals’ journal Ugeskrift for Læger. The following year, newspaper Jyllands-Posten reported the figure at 458.

There are two main categories of circumstances in which a doctor can choose to take this step. The first is in instances of violent or threatening behaviour from the patient towards the doctor. 

The second (and most common) is when the doctor considers the relationship to have deteriorated to the extent that confidence has broken down, according to Ugeskrift for Læger.

It should be noted that patients are not bound by any restrictions in this regard, and can decide to change their GP without having to give any justification.

A patient also has the right to appeal against a doctor’s decision to ask them to find a new GP. This is done by appealing to the local health authority, called a Region in the Danish health system.

In such cases, a board at the regional health authority will assess the claim and if it finds in favour of the patient may order the doctor to attempt to repair the relationship.

Doctors cannot end a relationship with a patient purely because a patient has made a complaint about them to health authorities. This is because patients should have the option of making complaints without fear of consequences for their future treatment. 

However, if this is accompanied by the conclusion on the doctor’s part that there is no longer confidence in them on the part of the patient, they can remove the patient from their list.

The right to no longer see patients in the circumstances detailed above is provided by doctors’ collective bargaining agreements, the working conditions agreed on between trade unions and employer confederations under the Danish labour market system.

SHOW COMMENTS