SHARE
COPY LINK

EUROPEAN UNION

France vs the EU: Bitter war of words escalates

An increasingly bitter slanging match between the members of the French government and EU chiefs escalated on Monday as EU Commission José Manuel Barroso compared France's socialist leaders to the far right for using Europe as a 'scapegoat' for its problems.

France vs the EU: Bitter war of words escalates
Jose Manuel Barroso appears in this photo montage to be aiming a slap in the direction of French minister Arnaud Montebourg. Photo: John Thys/Pierre Andrieu/AFP

Just days ahead of a key European summit an increasingly bitter spat between EU chiefs and France appeared to be spiraling out of control on Monday.

In the latest barb that will no doubt hurt members of the Socialist government European Commission chief José Manuel Barroso denounced 'leftist chauvinists' comparing them to the far-right and also accused France of using Europe as a "scapegoat" for troubles at home.

"It would be good if some politicians understood that they will not get very far by attacking Europe and trying to turn it into a scapegoat for their problems," Barroso said.

"Some left-wing nationalists have exactly the same views as the far right," he said in a scathing riposte to comments by French Industrial Renewal Minister Arnaud Montebourg who had earlier accused Barroso of fuelling the rise of the far right.

Europe is "paralyzed," Montebourg told France Inter radio earlier the day.

"It does not respond to any aspirations of the people on the industrial front, on the economic front, on the budget front, and in the end that plays into the hands of all the … anti-Europe parties in the EU," he said.

Despite the slanging match, Thomas Klau from the European Centre for Foreign Relations (ECFR) told The Local the spat was "more a war of words than substance" between the pair.

"What we can see in this latest exchange is two politicians who are short on moderation and principle and long on making opportunistic statements to make headlines and fuel public debate," Klau said.

Economist Christophe Blot from the French Economic Observatory also told The Local that the row was a "calculated political strategy" to serve their own purposes.

But Barroso is not alone against the French government. Lining up alongside him in Europe's corner is Frenchman and European Commissioner Michel Barnier, who is at the end of his tether with his compatriots.

"I've had it up to here with this and I say that with a degree of anger," Barnier said on Monday.

"I've had enough of hearing ministers in my country, politicians from left and right, saying that it is all somebody else's fault."

The recent war of words has its roots in France's bid to protect the European film and television industry from Hollywood dominance by stalling free-trade talks with the United States after which Barroso fanned the flames when he slammed France's stance as "reactionary".

French President François Hollande said he simply did not believe that Barroso could have made the comment while his Culture Minister Aurélie Filippetti said the remarks were "absolutely lamentable".

Row escalates into debate on Europe

The argument, however, has since developed from a debate over the French film industry into a fiery discussion on the whole European Union project.

In response to Barroso's latest jibe, French Housing Minister Cécile Duflot took to the airwaves telling France Inter radio station that she now regarded Brussels as little more than "a form of police service that watches nations from a height, and which doesn't build for the future".

The rift between France and the EU in general, and Barroso and French government ministers in particular, has been simmering for weeks, however.

France falling out of love with EU

In May, Barroso irked many in France when he accused Europe’s second-biggest economy of “spitting in the wind” with its “anti-globalization stance.”

Klau says the theory doing the rounds in European circles is that Barroso is attacking France in order to garner US support for a future bid to earn a top job at NATO or the UN when his EU mandate comes to an end.

"It's a tongue in cheek conspiracy theory but there is a lot of suspicion that this is the rationale for Barroso's words," Klau said.

Earlier that month, a survey by the Pew Research Centre concluded that the mood of the French public towards Europe had drastically worsened in recent years.

“No European country is becoming more dispirited and disillusioned faster than France. In just the past year, the public mood has soured dramatically across the board,” Pew Research's study concluded.

For some experts, however, the negative attitude among the French towards Europe was not a big surprise.

"The French attitude towards the EU has been heading this way for the last ten years. They have been under pressure to follow a German economic model that they don't want to imitate," Ulrike Guerot, from the European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR) told The Local at the time.

"France is a special country in terms of culture and traditions. Other European countries have adapted more quickly to globalization whereas France is still battling to keep its social and economic culture,” Guerot added.

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

BREXIT

OPINION: Pre-Brexit Brits in Europe should be given EU long-term residency

The EU has drawn up plans to make it easier for non-EU citizens to gain longterm EU residency so they can move more easily around the bloc, but Italy-based citizens' rights campaigner Clarissa Killwick says Brits who moved to the EU before Brexit are already losing out.

OPINION: Pre-Brexit Brits in Europe should be given EU long-term residency

With all the talk about the EU long-term residency permit and the proposed improvements there is no mention that UK citizens who are Withdrawal Agreement “beneficiaries” are currently being left out in the cold.

The European Commission has stated that we can hold multiple statuses including the EU long-term permit (Under a little-known EU law, third-country nationals can in theory acquire EU-wide long-term resident status if they have lived ‘legally’ in an EU country for at least five years) but in reality it is just not happening.

This effectively leaves Brits locked into their host countries while other third country nationals can enjoy some mobility rights. As yet, in Italy, it is literally a question of the computer saying no if someone tries to apply.

The lack of access to the EU long-term permit to pre-Brexit Brits is an EU-wide issue and has been flagged up to the European Commission but progress is very slow.

READ ALSO: EU government settle on rules for how non-EU citizens could move around Europe

My guess is that few UK nationals who already have permanent residency status under the Withdrawal Agreement are even aware of the extra mobility rights they could have with the EU long-term residency permit – or do not even realise they are two different things.

Perhaps there won’t be very large numbers clamouring for it but it is nothing short of discrimination not to make it accessible to British people who’ve built their lives in the EU.

They may have lost their status as EU citizens but nothing has changed concerning the contributions they make, both economically and socially.

An example of how Withdrawal Agreement Brits in Italy are losing out

My son, who has lived almost his whole life here, wanted to study in the Netherlands to improve his employment prospects.

Dutch universities grant home fees rather than international fees to holders of an EU long-term permit. The difference in fees for a Master’s, for example, is an eye-watering €18,000. He went through the application process, collecting the requisite documents, making the payments and waited many months for an appointment at the “questura”, (local immigration office).

On the day, it took some persuading before they agreed he should be able to apply but then the whole thing was stymied because the national computer system would not accept a UK national. I am in no doubt, incidentally, that had he been successful he would have had to hand in his WA  “carta di soggiorno”.

This was back in February 2022 and nothing has budged since then. In the meantime, it is a question of pay up or give up for any students in the same boat as my son. There is, in fact, a very high take up of the EU long-term permit in Italy so my son’s non-EU contemporaries do not face this barrier.

Long-term permit: The EU’s plan to make freedom of movement easier for non- EU nationals 

Completing his studies was stalled by a year until finally his Italian citizenship came through after waiting over 5 years.  I also meet working adults in Italy with the EU long-term permit who use it for work purposes, such as in Belgium and Germany, and for family reunification.  

Withdrawal agreement card should double up as EU long-term residency permit

A statement that Withdrawal Agreement beneficiaries should be able to hold multiple statuses is not that easy to find. You have to scroll quite far down the page on the European Commission’s website to find a link to an explanatory document. It has been languishing there since March 2022 but so far not proved very useful.

It has been pointed out to the Commission that the document needs to be multilingual not just in English and “branded” as an official communication from the Commission so it can be used as a stand-alone. But having an official document you can wave at the immigration authorities is going to get you nowhere if Member State governments haven’t acknowledged that WA beneficiaries can hold multiple statuses and issue clear guidance and make sure systems are modified accordingly.

I can appreciate this is no mean feat in countries where they do not usually allow multiple statuses or, even if they do, issue more than one residency card. Of course, other statuses we should be able to hold are not confined to EU long-term residency, they should include the EU Blue Card, dual nationality, family member of an EU citizen…

Personally, I do think people should be up in arms about this. The UK and EU negotiated an agreement which not only removed our freedom of movement as EU citizens, it also failed to automatically give us equal mobility rights to other third country nationals. We are now neither one thing nor the other.

It would seem the only favour the Withdrawal Agreement did us was we didn’t have to go out and come back in again! Brits who follow us, fortunate enough to get a visa, may well pip us at the post being able to apply for EU long-term residency as clearly defined non-EU citizens.

I have been bringing this issue to the attention of the embassy in Rome, FCDO and the European Commission for three years now. I hope we will see some movement soon.

Finally, there should be no dragging of heels assuming we will all take citizenship of our host countries. Actually, we shouldn’t have to, my son was fortunate, even though it took a long time. Others may not meet the requirements or wish to give up their UK citizenship in countries which do not permit dual nationality.  

Bureaucratic challenges may seem almost insurmountable but why not simply allow our Withdrawal Agreement permanent card to double up as the EU long-term residency permit.

Clarissa Killwick,

Since 2016, Clarissa has been a citizens’ rights campaigner and advocate with the pan-European group, Brexpats – Hear Our Voice.
She is co-founder and co-admin of the FB group in Italy, Beyond Brexit – UK citizens in Italy.

SHOW COMMENTS