SHARE
COPY LINK

IMMIGRATION

Foreigners ‘scared’ to leave abusive partners: report

The attitude of the Swiss authorities to foreigners who are victims of domestic abuse must change, a Geneva-based organization supporting the rights of foreigners in Switzerland has said.

Foreigners ‘scared’ to leave abusive partners: report
Photo: Bek Assine

Married foreigners from outside the EU whose residence permit depends on their spouse’s are often scared of leaving their abusive partner for fear of their permit being withdrawn, says a new report by the Observer for the rights of asylum-seekers and foreigners in French-speaking Switzerland (ODAE).

Published to coincide with International Women’s Day on Tuesday, the ODAE’s report said domestic violence is often under-estimated in Switzerland.

According to the federal statistics office, 15 women in Switzerland were killed by their spouse in 2014 and a further 25 were victims of attempted murder.

For foreigners whose residency depends on their partner’s status, “many hesitate to leave their spouse and report the abuse, often putting their lives in danger”, said the report.

In principle, foreign dependents are protected by law should the marriage fail due to domestic abuse.

Article 50 of the foreigners’ law counts marital violence as one of the ‘important personal reasons’ which allow a spouse to stay in Switzerland in their own right after leaving their partner.

But in practice that isn’t so straightforward, as victims must be able to prove the abuse, something that is hard for many beaten wives, Mélissa Llorens, coordinator for the ODAE, told newspaper Le Tribune de Genève.

“Medical notes are often not accepted by the authorities,” she told the paper.

“According to the supreme court you must also demonstrate that the abuse is systematic – something that is very difficult and not willingly accepted by the law.”

This aspect of the law was also picked up by Amnesty International in its 2015/16 annual report, released in February, which criticized the so-called ‘severity threshold’ used to assess cases of domestic abuse between foreign nationals.

In addition, under Article 50 foreigners must also prove they are sufficiently integrated in Switzerland to be able to hold a residence permit in their own right.

“Violence has serious consequences and victims sometimes have trouble finding and keeping jobs. Abuse hampers integration and these consequences are not sufficiently taken into account,” said Llorens.

Progress has been made on the issue especially in the canton of Vaud, Llorens told the paper, but more must be done.

Authorities should take into account the opinion of domestic abuse specialists and better recognize victims, she said.

“These questions should be part of the basic training for administrative staff.”

“We should also drop the requirement to demonstrate the intensity of the violence and its systematic nature,” she added.

Any children resulting from such marriages should also be considered, she said.

“They are direct victims of the violence between the couple and risk being sent away with their mother even if they have spent their whole life in Switzerland.”

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

IMMIGRATION

‘Shift to the right’: How European nations are tightening migration policies

The success of far-right parties in elections in key European countries is prompting even centrist and left-wing governments to tighten policies on migration, creating cracks in unity and sparking concern among activists.

'Shift to the right': How European nations are tightening migration policies

With the German far right coming out on top in two state elections earlier this month, the socialist-led national Berlin government has reimposed border controls on Western frontiers that are supposed to see freedom of movement in the European Union’s Schengen zone.

The Netherlands government, which includes the party of Dutch far-right leader Geert Wilders, announced on Wednesday that it had requested from Brussels an opt-out from EU rules on asylum, with Prime Minister Dick Schoof declaring that there was an asylum “crisis”.

Meanwhile, new British Prime Minister Keir Starmer of the left-wing Labour Party paid a visit to Rome for talks with Italian counterpart Georgia Meloni, whose party has neo-fascist roots, to discuss the strategies used by Italy in seeking to reduce migration.

Far-right parties performed strongly in June European elections, coming out on top in France, prompting President Emmanuel Macron to call snap elections which resulted in right-winger Michel Barnier, who has previously called for a moratorium on migration, being named prime minister.

We are witnessing the “continuation of a rightward shift in migration policies in the European Union,” said Jerome Vignon, migration advisor at the Jacques Delors Institute think-tank.

It reflected the rise of far-right parties in the European elections in June, and more recently in the two regional elections in Germany, he said, referring to a “quite clearly protectionist and conservative trend”.

Strong message

“Anti-immigration positions that were previously the preserve of the extreme right are now contaminating centre-right parties, even centre-left parties like the Social Democrats” in Germany, added Florian Trauner, a migration specialist at the Vrije Universiteit Brussel, the Dutch-speaking university in Brussels.

While the Labour government in London has ditched its right-wing Conservative predecessor administration’s plan to send asylum seekers to Rwanda, there is clearly interest in a deal Italy has struck with Albania to detain and process migrants there.

Within the European Union, Cyprus has suspended the processing of asylum applications from Syrian applicants, while laws have appeared authorising pushbacks at the border in Finland and Lithuania.

Under the pretext of dealing with “emergency” or “crisis” situations, the list of exemptions and deviations from the common rules defined by the European Union continues to grow.

All this flies in the face of the new EU migration pact, agreed only in May and coming into force in 2026.

In the wake of deadly attacks in Mannheim and most recently Solingen blamed on radical Islamists, German Chancellor Olaf Scholz’s government also expelled 28 Afghans back to their home country for the first time since the Taliban takeover of Kabul.

Such gestures from Germany are all the more symbolic given how the country since World War II has tried to turn itself into a model of integration, taking in a million refugees, mainly Syrians in 2015-2016 and then more than a million Ukrainian exiles since the Russian invasion.

Germany is sending a “strong message” to its own public as well as to its European partners, said Trauner.

The migratory pressure “remains significant” with more than 500,000 asylum applications registered in the European Union for the first six months of the year, he said.

‘Climate on impunity’

Germany, which received about a quarter of them alone, criticises the countries of southern Europe for allowing migrants to circulate without processing their asylum applications, but southern states denounce a lack of solidarity of the rest of Europe.

The moves by Germany were condemned by EU allies including Greece and Poland, but Scholz received the perhaps unwelcome accolade of praise from Hungarian right-wing Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Moscow’s closest friend in the European Union, when he declared “welcome to the club”.

The EU Commission’s failure to hold countries to account “only fosters a climate of impunity where unilateral migration policies and practices can proliferate,” said Adriana Tidona, Amnesty International’s Migration Researcher.

But behind the rhetoric, all European states are also aware of the crucial role played by migrants in keeping sectors going including transport and healthcare, as well as the importance of attracting skilled labour.

“Behind the symbolic speeches, European leaders, particularly German ones, remain pragmatic: border controls are targeted,” said Sophie Meiners, a migration researcher with the German Council on Foreign Relations.

Even Meloni’s government has allowed the entry into Italy of 452,000 foreign workers for the period 2023-2025.

“In parallel to this kind of new restrictive measures, they know they need to address skilled labour needs,” she said.

SHOW COMMENTS