SHARE
COPY LINK

IMMIGRATION

Swiss-EU negotiations resume but no deal yet

Negotiations between Switzerland and the EU over immigration resumed on Monday when the Swiss president, Johann Schneider-Ammann, met with EU Commission president Jean-Claude Juncker in Zurich.

Swiss-EU negotiations resume but no deal yet
Juncker and Schneider-Ammann meet in Zurich. Photo: Manuel Lopez/Pool/AFP

In a press conference after the meeting Schneider-Ammann said he was “very satisfied” with the conversation despite there still being no deal on the table in the immigration versus free movement debate, reported Tages Anzeiger.

According to a Swiss government statement, the two men discussed several matters relating to Swiss-EU relations, including the issues surrounding Switzerland’s 2014 anti-immigration vote.

Switzerland has until next February to implement the legally-binding 2014 initiative, approved in a referendum, which demands some form of quotas be placed on immigration from the EU.

Introducing such curbs would contravene the EU’s principle of free movement of people, to which Switzerland adheres through a bilateral agreement. As such, the vote placed the country’s relationship with the bloc under strain, with the EU initially freezing Swiss participation in EU programmes including the Erasmus+ student exchange programme and scientific research project Horizon 2020.

Negotiations over a mutually agreeable solution have been made more difficult by Britain’s decision to withdraw from the EU, and Switzerland was hoping to wrap up its own discussions with Brussels before it addressed the British question.

But that has not been possible.

Following Monday’s resumption of  talks, Juncker said Brexit had complicated the situation and that there would be no common immigration/free movement deal for both countries, according to Tages Anzeiger.

The Swiss government is currently considering a nuanced solution to the problem whereby instead of national quotas, temporary limits would be placed on immigration in certain regions or job sectors, should immigration cause issues in those specific areas.

While Juncker hardly green-lit the idea, the Commission may not have any objections to Switzerland “gently privileging” the domestic workforce in this way, said the paper.

Though there remains no deal in sight, Juncker said he was “more optimistic today than I was in previous weeks”.

In its statement, the Swiss federal government said the pair also discussed questions surrounding Swiss participation in Horizon 2020, which depends on the ratification of the Croatian protocol to extend the Swiss-EU bilateral agreement on the free movement of people to Croatia. Switzerland initially refused to sign the protocol in the wake of its anti-immigration vote, before changing its mind in March.

“Each party has interest in preserving and evolving the bilateral path which is a success both for Switzerland and for the EU,” said the statement.

The pair will next meet in October.

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

IMMIGRATION

‘Shift to the right’: How European nations are tightening migration policies

The success of far-right parties in elections in key European countries is prompting even centrist and left-wing governments to tighten policies on migration, creating cracks in unity and sparking concern among activists.

'Shift to the right': How European nations are tightening migration policies

With the German far right coming out on top in two state elections earlier this month, the socialist-led national Berlin government has reimposed border controls on Western frontiers that are supposed to see freedom of movement in the European Union’s Schengen zone.

The Netherlands government, which includes the party of Dutch far-right leader Geert Wilders, announced Wednesday that it had requested from Brussels an opt-out from EU rules on asylum, with Prime Minister Dick Schoof declaring that there was an asylum “crisis”.

Meanwhile, new British Prime Minister Keir Starmer of the left-wing Labour Party paid a visit to Rome for talks with Italian counterpart Georgia Meloni, whose party has neo-fascist roots, to discuss the strategies used by Italy in seeking to reduce migration.

Far-right parties performed strongly in June European elections, coming out on top in France, prompting President Emmanuel Macron to call snap elections which resulted in right-winger Michel Barnier, who has previously called for a moratorium on migration, being named prime minister.

We are witnessing the “continuation of a rightward shift in migration policies in the European Union,” said Jerome Vignon, migration advisor at the Jacques Delors Institute think-tank.

It reflected the rise of far-right parties in the European elections in June, and more recently in the two regional elections in Germany, he said, referring to a “quite clearly protectionist and conservative trend”.

Strong message

“Anti-immigration positions that were previously the preserve of the extreme right are now contaminating centre-right parties, even centre-left parties like the Social Democrats” in Germany, added Florian Trauner, a migration specialist at the Vrije Universiteit Brussel, the Dutch-speaking university in Brussels.

While the Labour government in London has ditched its right-wing Conservative predecessor administration’s plan to send asylum seekers to Rwanda, there is clearly interest in a deal Italy has struck with Albania to detain and process migrants there.

Within the European Union, Cyprus has suspended the processing of asylum applications from Syrian applicants, while laws have appeared authorising pushbacks at the border in Finland and Lithuania.

Under the pretext of dealing with “emergency” or “crisis” situations, the list of exemptions and deviations from the common rules defined by the European Union continues to grow.

All this flies in the face of the new EU migration pact, agreed only in May and coming into force in 2026.

In the wake of deadly attacks in Mannheim and most recently Solingen blamed on radical Islamists, German Chancellor Olaf Scholz’s government also expelled 28 Afghans back to their home country for the first time since the Taliban takeover of Kabul.

Such gestures from Germany are all the more symbolic given how the country since World War II has tried to turn itself into a model of integration, taking in a million refugees, mainly Syrians in 2015-2016 and then more than a million Ukrainian exiles since the Russian invasion.

Germany is sending a “strong message” to its own public as well as to its European partners, said Trauner.

The migratory pressure “remains significant” with more than 500,000 asylum applications registered in the European Union for the first six months of the year, he said.

‘Climate on impunity’

Germany, which received about a quarter of them alone, criticises the countries of southern Europe for allowing migrants to circulate without processing their asylum applications, but southern states denounce a lack of solidarity of the rest of Europe.

The moves by Germany were condemned by EU allies including Greece and Poland, but Scholz received the perhaps unwelcome accolade of praise from Hungarian right-wing Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Moscow’s closest friend in the European Union, when he declared “welcome to the club”.

The EU Commission’s failure to hold countries to account “only fosters a climate of impunity where unilateral migration policies and practices can proliferate,” said Adriana Tidona, Amnesty International’s Migration Researcher.

But behind the rhetoric, all European states are also aware of the crucial role played by migrants in keeping sectors going including transport and healthcare, as well as the importance of attracting skilled labour.

“Behind the symbolic speeches, European leaders, particularly German ones, remain pragmatic: border controls are targeted,” said Sophie Meiners, a migration researcher with the German Council on Foreign Relations.

Even Meloni’s government has allowed the entry into Italy of 452,000 foreign workers for the period 2023-2025.

“In parallel to this kind of new restrictive measures, they know they need to address skilled labour needs,” she said.

SHOW COMMENTS