SHARE
COPY LINK

SWEDEN

Swedish Foreign Minister: Brexit ‘somewhat chaotic’

Sweden’s Foreign Minister Margot Wallström has described the aftermath of the Brexit vote as "somewhat chaotic" after meeting British Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson in London.

Swedish Foreign Minister: Brexit  'somewhat chaotic'
Margot Wallström and Boris Johnson pictured in London. Photo: Eric Sundström/UD

Wallström travelled to London to meet Johnson on Wednesday, and the subject of Brexit dominated the talks.

“This is going to be a pretty difficult time for them,” she told Swedish news agency TT after the meeting.

“They know very well that we regret the outcome of the referendum, but we respect that the British people have spoken, and this is going to happen in the future. We will want to see them formulate what they want as quickly as possible, and that this process doesn’t take longer than necessary. But at the same time, it has been somewhat chaotic, and they need some time to sort out their own wishes and thoughts around it,” she added.

The Swedish government made no secret of the fact that it wanted the UK to remain in the EU in the build up to the Brexit vote last June. In an opinion piece published in English by The Local in May, Wallström argued that “a united Europe benefits both Britain and Sweden”.

The UK voted to leave however, and the appointment of Johnson as Foreign Secretary was a left-field one. The pro-Brexit campaigner is known for his colourful record when interacting with people from other cultures, but Wallström had polite words to say about him following their meeting:

“He is easy to talk to. He is easy-going, approachable and open and has a sense of humour, and that always helps when you are speaking with colleagues.”

The two politicians also spoke about US President-elect Donald Trump, and on that subject they had differences in opinion.

“I think Boris Johnson’s view is that we must let Trump show what he can do and that you don’t need to think the worst. I’m maybe a bit more cynical, I think you also actually have to judge the man on what he has said, and we must be prepared and have a good plan. He has to show in practice what his policies will entail,” Wallström concluded.

Along with Brexit and the US, climate change and European security and trade policy were also on the agenda in London.

For members

BREXIT

Commission official: ‘Up to Sweden how strict it is on Brexit applications’

An official from the European Commission has defended its decision not to take action on Sweden's strict treatment of late applications for post-Brexit residency, arguing that it is up to member states how to apply the Withdrawal Agreement.

Commission official: 'Up to Sweden how strict it is on Brexit applications'

In an email sent to The Local, the official confirmed the latest data, published at the end of last year, which showed that 22 percent of residence applications from UK nationals under the Withdrawal Agreement had not been successful in Sweden. The official said this was similar to the rejection rate for Swedish citizens’ applications in the UK. 

“Through its regular monitoring in Annual reports under Article 159(2) of the Withdrawal Agreement, the European Commission is aware of the fact that Sweden has a high rate of refusal of residence applications under Article 18(1) of the Withdrawal Agreement,” the official said. 

But they said that this in itself did not indicate that Sweden was failing to apply the UK Withdrawal Agreement correctly. 

“As long as there is no indication that a Member State in question is incorrectly applying the Withdrawal Agreement rules, it is not for the Commission to tell Member States how strict or lenient they should be when processing late applications,” the Commission official said.

READ ALSO: Brits in Sweden still in limbo years after Brexit deadline

Two EU lawyers The Local spoke to earlier this summer said that they believed that the Swedish Migration Agency had not been correctly applying the proportionality test to late applications, and had been too narrow in its interpretation of what constitutes “reasonable grounds” for a late application.

They also said that they believed the Migration Agency had been overly strict on what level of employment or savings UK citizens were required to have to qualify as resident in Sweden under EU law, and to therefore be qualified for post-Brexit residency.

SEE MORE: Why did Sweden reject Brits for post-Brexit residency

But the Commission official said that when it came to the late applications at least, Sweden was entitled to take the position it had done. 

“If the host State authorities reach the conclusion that a late applicant did not have reasonable grounds for missing the application deadline, they do not have to deal with the application on substance,” the official said.

“This means that someone who would have qualified for the residence rights under the Withdrawal Agreement might not be granted those rights if they missed the application deadline and did not have a valid reason for doing so.” 

READ ALSO: Is Sweden getting EU law wrong on Brexit cases? 

An unusual high rejection rate, the official continued, did not mean that Sweden was breaking the terms of the EU Withdrawal agreement. 

“The fact that there are negative decisions being taken by Member States under Article 18 of the Withdrawal Agreement (WA) does not, in itself, indicate that those Member States apply the Withdrawal Agreement incorrectly,” they said.

The Migration Agency had carried out a review of refusals, they said, checking a selection for “legal quality”, something The Local has previously reported on.

The Commission had received the Migration Agency’s review, they said, but had yet to complete its analysis of the findings. 

SHOW COMMENTS