SHARE
COPY LINK

BREXIT

What do Swedish businesses think about Brexit impact?

One in three Swedish companies with British business ties thinks Brexit will have a negative impact, according to a new survey.

What do Swedish businesses think about Brexit impact?
One thousand Swedish businesses responded to the survey. Photo: AP Photo/Frank Augstein

The UK is one of Sweden's most important trade partners with goods and services worth around 140 billion kronor ($15.5 billion) exported to British customers in 2017 alone. Around 15 percent of respondents to the survey said they traded directly with Britain and the country makes up more than seven percent of Swedish imports and exports, wrote Swedish business industry organization Företagarna.

In June it sent out a survey to more than 3,000 business people across Sweden, quizzing them on small and growing businesses in a globalized world – including the potential impact of Brexit.

READ ALSO: How should Brits in Sweden prepare for Brexit?

Out of all the 1,000 who responded to the survey, 14 percent said they thought their business would be adversely affected by Brexit. A majority of 69 percent told the survey they did not think Brexit would have much of an effect on their business at all, but that included mainly companies not active on the global market. Only two percent predicted Brexit would have a positive impact.

Looking only at companies that trade internationally, 27 percent said Brexit would have a negative impact, and among those trading directly with Britain the same figure rose to more than a third.

“However, the uncertainty is significant and one in six companies has answered 'do not know or decline to say' which can be explained by the fact that negotiations are ongoing and the conditions for the UK's exit from the EU are, for the most part, largely unknown,” wrote Företagarna.

READ ALSO: Brits face long waits for Swedish citizenship

Among the potential adverse effects of Brexit, the top-three concerns were increased difficulties handling VAT when trading with Britain, custom duties and concern over the indirect long-term impact.

The Local wants to hear from our British readers: are you worried about Brexit, and if so, is there a particular question you would like the answer to? Fill out our Brexit survey here. Thanks for your help.

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.
For members

BREXIT

Commission official: ‘Up to Sweden how strict it is on Brexit applications’

An official from the European Commission has defended its decision not to take action on Sweden's strict treatment of late applications for post-Brexit residency, arguing that it is up to member states how to apply the Withdrawal Agreement.

Commission official: 'Up to Sweden how strict it is on Brexit applications'

In an email sent to The Local, the official confirmed the latest data, published at the end of last year, which showed that 22 percent of residence applications from UK nationals under the Withdrawal Agreement had not been successful in Sweden. The official said this was similar to the rejection rate for Swedish citizens’ applications in the UK. 

“Through its regular monitoring in Annual reports under Article 159(2) of the Withdrawal Agreement, the European Commission is aware of the fact that Sweden has a high rate of refusal of residence applications under Article 18(1) of the Withdrawal Agreement,” the official said. 

But they said that this in itself did not indicate that Sweden was failing to apply the UK Withdrawal Agreement correctly. 

“As long as there is no indication that a Member State in question is incorrectly applying the Withdrawal Agreement rules, it is not for the Commission to tell Member States how strict or lenient they should be when processing late applications,” the Commission official said.

READ ALSO: Brits in Sweden still in limbo years after Brexit deadline

Two EU lawyers The Local spoke to earlier this summer said that they believed that the Swedish Migration Agency had not been correctly applying the proportionality test to late applications, and had been too narrow in its interpretation of what constitutes “reasonable grounds” for a late application.

They also said that they believed the Migration Agency had been overly strict on what level of employment or savings UK citizens were required to have to qualify as resident in Sweden under EU law, and to therefore be qualified for post-Brexit residency.

SEE MORE: Why did Sweden reject Brits for post-Brexit residency

But the Commission official said that when it came to the late applications at least, Sweden was entitled to take the position it had done. 

“If the host State authorities reach the conclusion that a late applicant did not have reasonable grounds for missing the application deadline, they do not have to deal with the application on substance,” the official said.

“This means that someone who would have qualified for the residence rights under the Withdrawal Agreement might not be granted those rights if they missed the application deadline and did not have a valid reason for doing so.” 

READ ALSO: Is Sweden getting EU law wrong on Brexit cases? 

An unusual high rejection rate, the official continued, did not mean that Sweden was breaking the terms of the EU Withdrawal agreement. 

“The fact that there are negative decisions being taken by Member States under Article 18 of the Withdrawal Agreement (WA) does not, in itself, indicate that those Member States apply the Withdrawal Agreement incorrectly,” they said.

The Migration Agency had carried out a review of refusals, they said, checking a selection for “legal quality”, something The Local has previously reported on.

The Commission had received the Migration Agency’s review, they said, but had yet to complete its analysis of the findings. 

SHOW COMMENTS