SHARE
COPY LINK
For members

BREXIT

‘Brexit isn’t just a concern for British citizens in Sweden’

As an American in Sweden, little more than the whims of fate and politics separate my situation from that of British citizens living here, writes Victoria Martínez.

'Brexit isn't just a concern for British citizens in Sweden'
Pro-EU demonstrators fly flags in London. File photo: AP Photo/Frank Augstein

Each time I speak to or read about a British citizen in Sweden scurrying to obtain Swedish citizenship, I can't help but repeat to myself the proverb, “There but for the grace of God go I.” Not for religious reasons, but because I'm a US citizen living in Sweden.

As is repeatedly remarked, it is sometimes hard to tell which of these two “World Powers” is doing the best job of embarrassing itself on the world stage. While that may be true, I'm at least not faced with the imminent prospect of leaving the country I call home because of the political chaos in my country of origin. I don't have to scurry to do anything to stay in a country where my family and I have put down (hopefully permanent) roots.

But the fact that this is exactly what many Brits in Sweden and elsewhere are facing does make me think about how I would feel and what I would do in the same circumstances. In other words, if my native country were not only “embarrassing” me, but also threatening to upend my existence.

Of the themes I hear and read repeatedly by British citizens in Sweden, two stand out as particularly relatable to me. First, that they have a deep love for their native country but feel profoundly disappointed in the political situation there. Second, that they prefer living in Sweden because they feel that the lifestyle and social system are superior to those “back home.”

Both sentiments are regularly steamrolled by people who seem bound and determined to be divisive – a tactic that, as I see it, has not only helped to create, but also helps to fuel the current political nightmares in the US and UK. In response to this, I quote 82-year-old Brit Tim Crosfield, a newly-minted Swedish citizen whose interview with Swedish news agency TT was recently featured in The Local Sweden, “I'm a longtime conservative but I'm a remainer. It's no longer possible to say 'you are right or left therefore you are this or that.'”

People like Mr Crosfield give me hope that there are rational people out there who don't see things like political affiliations and national identity as punishing and inflexible iron rods used to build barriers and stoke sectarianism.      

MORE ON LIVING IN SWEDEN: 


File photo: Helena Wahlman/imagebank.sweden.se

Living abroad in three countries has opened my mind in countless ways and helped me recognize times in my life when I thought I was flexible in my thinking but was really barely stretching. Even a relatively big bubble is still a bubble. Through its hazy perimeter, I saw much that was different. While I accepted those differences, I was nonetheless incapable of making qualified comparisons or judgments.

For instance, when my husband, who is from Spain, and I were living in the US, I couldn't fully appreciate why he took issue with the healthcare and health insurance system there. It had always “worked” for me and was the only system I really knew. I acknowledged that the system in Spain was different but didn't see how it could necessarily be “better”.

Then I slipped on our wet kitchen floor in Texas and fractured my skull. In a couple of years, despite being well (and expensively) insured, we saw ourselves go from relatively affluent to nearly bankrupt as extensive and expensive medical treatments and my inability to work drained us in every way. It was a harsh reality check.

When we made the move to Spain, I still required certain medical treatments and prescription medications. In the US, these had cost us a thousand or more dollars a month, in addition to health insurance. In Spain, we paid next to nothing. And, because the healthcare system in Spain works as it does, my course of treatment went from one of never-ending therapies and medications to one that helped me recover to the point where I didn't need them anymore.

Yes, that was Spain and I'm supposed to be writing about Sweden; but that experience opened my mind in a way that has extended to Sweden, where I've had a very good experience with the healthcare system for almost three years. Is it perfect here? Of course not, but I can compare it positively to the system in the US, and I also have my experience of Spain's system as an additional gauge.

MORE BREXIT NEWS:


British Prime Minister Theresa May and her Swedish counterpart Stefan Löfven. File photo: Jonas Ekströmer/TT

The bottom line is, the healthcare system in the US, with its high and potentially crippling costs, is one of the reasons I would not want to return to live there, along with other key issues like the lack of gun control, the exorbitant cost of child care and quality higher education, non-existent parental leave and limited family time via paid holidays, and so on.

These considerations, my 15-year marriage to a Spanish/EU citizen, years of living abroad, and my critique of the current political situation in the US do not mean I don't “love” my native country or have somehow abandoned it. But my situation does make me both an insider and an outsider to it, with a nuanced perspective and sense of place and belonging. Mr Crosfield summed it up beautifully when he said, “I do wonder if I'm still British. Or am I somewhere in the middle, somewhere offshore in the North Sea.”

Those of us who live outside our country of origin, for whatever reason, do essentially live “somewhere in the middle.” And, as with all of humanity, most of the time, surprisingly little separates us from an entirely different life or existence than the one we have at any given moment. Those with advantages can lose them as quickly as those with none can gain them.

Though these whims of fate are often attributed to some god or gods, the current state of affairs in the UK and the US – and the adverse effects they are having on untold numbers of people – are further proof that it is just as likely (if not more likely) that they are the result of politics.

Whichever force may be at work, the result is the same, and it is only by the proverbial “grace of God” that I am not also scurrying for a Swedish passport as many Brits are now doing.

Victoria Martínez is an American historical researcher, writer and author of three historical non-fiction books. She lives in Småland county, Sweden, with her Spanish husband and their two children.

Member comments

  1. Americans aren’t nearly as embarrassed as they were when we had that castrato, Barack Obama, as president, Vicky.

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.
For members

BREXIT

Commission official: ‘Up to Sweden how strict it is on Brexit applications’

An official from the European Commission has defended its decision not to take action on Sweden's strict treatment of late applications for post-Brexit residency, arguing that it is up to member states how to apply the Withdrawal Agreement.

Commission official: 'Up to Sweden how strict it is on Brexit applications'

In an email sent to The Local, the official confirmed the latest data, published at the end of last year, which showed that 22 percent of residence applications from UK nationals under the Withdrawal Agreement had not been successful in Sweden. The official said this was similar to the rejection rate for Swedish citizens’ applications in the UK. 

“Through its regular monitoring in Annual reports under Article 159(2) of the Withdrawal Agreement, the European Commission is aware of the fact that Sweden has a high rate of refusal of residence applications under Article 18(1) of the Withdrawal Agreement,” the official said. 

But they said that this in itself did not indicate that Sweden was failing to apply the UK Withdrawal Agreement correctly. 

“As long as there is no indication that a Member State in question is incorrectly applying the Withdrawal Agreement rules, it is not for the Commission to tell Member States how strict or lenient they should be when processing late applications,” the Commission official said.

READ ALSO: Brits in Sweden still in limbo years after Brexit deadline

Two EU lawyers The Local spoke to earlier this summer said that they believed that the Swedish Migration Agency had not been correctly applying the proportionality test to late applications, and had been too narrow in its interpretation of what constitutes “reasonable grounds” for a late application.

They also said that they believed the Migration Agency had been overly strict on what level of employment or savings UK citizens were required to have to qualify as resident in Sweden under EU law, and to therefore be qualified for post-Brexit residency.

SEE MORE: Why did Sweden reject Brits for post-Brexit residency

But the Commission official said that when it came to the late applications at least, Sweden was entitled to take the position it had done. 

“If the host State authorities reach the conclusion that a late applicant did not have reasonable grounds for missing the application deadline, they do not have to deal with the application on substance,” the official said.

“This means that someone who would have qualified for the residence rights under the Withdrawal Agreement might not be granted those rights if they missed the application deadline and did not have a valid reason for doing so.” 

READ ALSO: Is Sweden getting EU law wrong on Brexit cases? 

An unusual high rejection rate, the official continued, did not mean that Sweden was breaking the terms of the EU Withdrawal agreement. 

“The fact that there are negative decisions being taken by Member States under Article 18 of the Withdrawal Agreement (WA) does not, in itself, indicate that those Member States apply the Withdrawal Agreement incorrectly,” they said.

The Migration Agency had carried out a review of refusals, they said, checking a selection for “legal quality”, something The Local has previously reported on.

The Commission had received the Migration Agency’s review, they said, but had yet to complete its analysis of the findings. 

SHOW COMMENTS