SHARE
COPY LINK

BREXIT

Sweden to UK: Increased risk of no-deal Brexit ‘serious’

Sweden's Europe Minister has told the new UK government that it is "serious" that its tougher position on Brexit has boosted the risk of the UK leaving the EU without an agreement.

Sweden to UK: Increased risk of no-deal Brexit 'serious'
Sweden's European Union minister Hans Dahlgren at an earlier meeting. Photo: Stina Stjernkvist/TT
In a bilateral meeting in Stockholm, Hans Dahlgren told Stephen Barclay, the UK's Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union, that Sweden was concerned by the new UK government's redoubled determination to leave the European Union on October 31st. 
 
“It is serious that the risk of a hard Brexit has increased,” Dahlgren told The Local was the message he had conveyed to Barclay at the meeting, held on Friday afternoon at government offices. 
 
“As you know, the British government has decided they are going to leave the EU on October 31st, deal or no deal, while we are insisting it is best for all parties concerned that we have orderly exit and that they leave with a deal.” 
 
Dahlgren said that Barclay had in turn reiterated the UK's tough new position at the meeting. 
 
“He said that this is going to happen. He said that unless there is an agreement, there is going to be a hard Brexit on October 31st.”
 
In interviews with Swedish media, Dahlgren said that Barclay had been very clear that the new government opposed the so-called “back-stop” arrangement guaranteeing that there would be no hard border between Northern Ireland and Ireland. 
 
Stephen Barclay arriving at 10 Downing Street in London after Boris Johnson's appointment as PM. Photo: Matt Dunham/AP
 
A spokesperson for the British embassy in Stockholm said that Barclay and Dahlgren had also discussed safeguarding the rights of British citizens living in Sweden, and those of Swedes living in the UK. 
 
“During his meeting with Minister for EU Affairs, Hans Dahlgren, the Secretary of State for Exiting the EU discussed the protection of citizens' rights – both for British citizens living in Sweden, and for Swedish citizens living in the UK,” the spokesperson said. “They discussed how we can reach an agreement that works for everybody.“
 
But Dahlgren told The Local that the two sides had only “touched upon that briefly”. 
 
“As you know, we have in Sweden taken decisions which will allow British citizens living in Sweden to continue to live here with a grace period of one year also after a hard Brexit, and we know that the new British government is planning similar decisions for Swedes and other European citizens who now live in the UK,” he said. 
 
READ ALSO:
However, he said that it remained unclear how the new British government would treat Swedish citizens who wanted to move to the UK for work after October 31st.
 
“The previous British government had made some openings for people coming to the UK after Brexit, and those statements have not yet been endorsed by the new government,” he said.  
 
He told The Local that he had emphasized to Barclay the importance of coming to a quick decision on this. “First of all, we want to get information as soon as possible,” he said. 
 
Dahlgren said he did not have any more information on how Sweden planned to treat British citizens living in Sweden once the one-year grace period was over.  
 
“We have done what we need to do for those who are in Sweden now. What will happen to those who come here after the exit, I cannot comment on,” he added.
 
The UK has in the past been criticized for seeking to negotiate bilaterally with national governments over its departure from the European Union, but Dahlgren said that Barclay had not attempted to ask Sweden for support in Brussels. 
 
“I think he understands that we are not as Sweden negotiating with the United Kingdom. It is the EU who is negotiating with the United Kingdom, though Mr Barnier,” he said. “He understands also that he cannot negotiate with the individual member states.”

Member comments

  1. The people of the UK do NOT know the consequences of leaving the EU. They only see one thing, too many Polish in the UK. They don’t think about all the people from living abroad who will now be forced out.

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.
For members

BREXIT

Commission official: ‘Up to Sweden how strict it is on Brexit applications’

An official from the European Commission has defended its decision not to take action on Sweden's strict treatment of late applications for post-Brexit residency, arguing that it is up to member states how to apply the Withdrawal Agreement.

Commission official: 'Up to Sweden how strict it is on Brexit applications'

In an email sent to The Local, the official confirmed the latest data, published at the end of last year, which showed that 22 percent of residence applications from UK nationals under the Withdrawal Agreement had not been successful in Sweden. The official said this was similar to the rejection rate for Swedish citizens’ applications in the UK. 

“Through its regular monitoring in Annual reports under Article 159(2) of the Withdrawal Agreement, the European Commission is aware of the fact that Sweden has a high rate of refusal of residence applications under Article 18(1) of the Withdrawal Agreement,” the official said. 

But they said that this in itself did not indicate that Sweden was failing to apply the UK Withdrawal Agreement correctly. 

“As long as there is no indication that a Member State in question is incorrectly applying the Withdrawal Agreement rules, it is not for the Commission to tell Member States how strict or lenient they should be when processing late applications,” the Commission official said.

READ ALSO: Brits in Sweden still in limbo years after Brexit deadline

Two EU lawyers The Local spoke to earlier this summer said that they believed that the Swedish Migration Agency had not been correctly applying the proportionality test to late applications, and had been too narrow in its interpretation of what constitutes “reasonable grounds” for a late application.

They also said that they believed the Migration Agency had been overly strict on what level of employment or savings UK citizens were required to have to qualify as resident in Sweden under EU law, and to therefore be qualified for post-Brexit residency.

SEE MORE: Why did Sweden reject Brits for post-Brexit residency

But the Commission official said that when it came to the late applications at least, Sweden was entitled to take the position it had done. 

“If the host State authorities reach the conclusion that a late applicant did not have reasonable grounds for missing the application deadline, they do not have to deal with the application on substance,” the official said.

“This means that someone who would have qualified for the residence rights under the Withdrawal Agreement might not be granted those rights if they missed the application deadline and did not have a valid reason for doing so.” 

READ ALSO: Is Sweden getting EU law wrong on Brexit cases? 

An unusual high rejection rate, the official continued, did not mean that Sweden was breaking the terms of the EU Withdrawal agreement. 

“The fact that there are negative decisions being taken by Member States under Article 18 of the Withdrawal Agreement (WA) does not, in itself, indicate that those Member States apply the Withdrawal Agreement incorrectly,” they said.

The Migration Agency had carried out a review of refusals, they said, checking a selection for “legal quality”, something The Local has previously reported on.

The Commission had received the Migration Agency’s review, they said, but had yet to complete its analysis of the findings. 

SHOW COMMENTS