SHARE
COPY LINK

IMMIGRATION

Swiss right-wing party wants mandatory deportation of criminal foreigners

Just over half of foreigners who commit crimes are deported in Switzerland. Switzerland’s largest political party wants to make such deportations mandatory via a referendum.

Swiss right-wing party wants mandatory deportation of criminal foreigners
A poster produced by Switzerland's SVP calling for deportation of foreigners who have committed crimes. Photo: FABRICE COFFRINI / AFP

Newly released figures show that only 58 percent of foreigners who commit criminal offences are deported, despite a law which requires expulsion from Switzerland for all foreigners who commit criminal offences. 

The right-wing Swiss People’s Party, the largest party in Swiss parliament, has criticised the figures and is considering a new referendum which would see foreigners subject to mandatory deportation for committing crimes. 

The findings show that in 2019, 2,883 foreigners committed crimes which required deportation. However, 1,658 people were deported – only 58 percent. 

Those who were saved from deportation had Switzerland’s ‘hardship clause’ to thank. 

While the average was 58 percent of offenders deported, the deportation rate varied significantly from canton to canton. 

In Lucerne, 90 percent of offenders were deported, while in Neuchatel it is at 23 percent. 

In Zurich, Switzerland's largest canton where an estimated 50 percent are foreign, the deportation rate is 46 percent. 

Not all criminal offences will attract deportation, only those which are deemed to have a sufficient degree of seriousness. 

Felicitas Lenzinger, the president of the criminal court in Basel, told Swiss daily 20 Minutes that shoplifting and other minor offences would not attract a deportation order. 

'Scrap the hardship clause'

The hardship clause, which allows cantons to spare deportations where it would lead to hardship for the deported person, is now the SVP’s new target. 

As reported in Swiss media outlet 20 Minutes, the SVP is considering a new initiative to scrap the hardship clause – thereby ensuring mandatory deportation for foreigners who commit criminal acts. 

In a statement, the SVP threatened that a popular initiative would be launched if Swiss authorities failed to deport more foreigners convicted of crimes. 

“If the Federal Council and Parliament refuse to do so within a reasonable period of time, the SVP will consider a popular initiative to abolish the hardship clause,” it reads. 

“Prosecutors and judges are fussing on a large scale for the will of the people and security in our country.”

Are the sheep about to return? 

The campaign has been a pet issue of the SVP for over a decade, with several initiatives launched to make it easier to remove criminal foreigners. 

The law came about via a successful referendum supported by the SVP in 2010, while a 2016 vote – which included an internationally controversial advertising campaign depicting a white sheep kicking a black sheep out of Switzerland – to expand deportation powers was defeated at the ballot box. 

READ: SVP renounces shock poster tactics for June public vote

A poster produced by Switzerland's SVP calling for deportation of foreigners who have committed crimes. Photo: FABRICE COFFRINI / AFP

According to Swiss media outlet Le Temps, the SVP is now shifting its focus to these figures due to fear that it will lose its popular initiative to restrict freedom of movement.

Originally scheduled for May, the initiative has been moved to September due to the pandemic. Although recent polls have indicated the initiative is likely to fail, experts believe it has a better chance than before the pandemic due to a rise in Swiss nationalist sentiment. 

 

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

IMMIGRATION

‘Shift to the right’: How European nations are tightening migration policies

The success of far-right parties in elections in key European countries is prompting even centrist and left-wing governments to tighten policies on migration, creating cracks in unity and sparking concern among activists.

'Shift to the right': How European nations are tightening migration policies

With the German far right coming out on top in two state elections earlier this month, the socialist-led national Berlin government has reimposed border controls on Western frontiers that are supposed to see freedom of movement in the European Union’s Schengen zone.

The Netherlands government, which includes the party of Dutch far-right leader Geert Wilders, announced Wednesday that it had requested from Brussels an opt-out from EU rules on asylum, with Prime Minister Dick Schoof declaring that there was an asylum “crisis”.

Meanwhile, new British Prime Minister Keir Starmer of the left-wing Labour Party paid a visit to Rome for talks with Italian counterpart Georgia Meloni, whose party has neo-fascist roots, to discuss the strategies used by Italy in seeking to reduce migration.

Far-right parties performed strongly in June European elections, coming out on top in France, prompting President Emmanuel Macron to call snap elections which resulted in right-winger Michel Barnier, who has previously called for a moratorium on migration, being named prime minister.

We are witnessing the “continuation of a rightward shift in migration policies in the European Union,” said Jerome Vignon, migration advisor at the Jacques Delors Institute think-tank.

It reflected the rise of far-right parties in the European elections in June, and more recently in the two regional elections in Germany, he said, referring to a “quite clearly protectionist and conservative trend”.

Strong message

“Anti-immigration positions that were previously the preserve of the extreme right are now contaminating centre-right parties, even centre-left parties like the Social Democrats” in Germany, added Florian Trauner, a migration specialist at the Vrije Universiteit Brussel, the Dutch-speaking university in Brussels.

While the Labour government in London has ditched its right-wing Conservative predecessor administration’s plan to send asylum seekers to Rwanda, there is clearly interest in a deal Italy has struck with Albania to detain and process migrants there.

Within the European Union, Cyprus has suspended the processing of asylum applications from Syrian applicants, while laws have appeared authorising pushbacks at the border in Finland and Lithuania.

Under the pretext of dealing with “emergency” or “crisis” situations, the list of exemptions and deviations from the common rules defined by the European Union continues to grow.

All this flies in the face of the new EU migration pact, agreed only in May and coming into force in 2026.

In the wake of deadly attacks in Mannheim and most recently Solingen blamed on radical Islamists, German Chancellor Olaf Scholz’s government also expelled 28 Afghans back to their home country for the first time since the Taliban takeover of Kabul.

Such gestures from Germany are all the more symbolic given how the country since World War II has tried to turn itself into a model of integration, taking in a million refugees, mainly Syrians in 2015-2016 and then more than a million Ukrainian exiles since the Russian invasion.

Germany is sending a “strong message” to its own public as well as to its European partners, said Trauner.

The migratory pressure “remains significant” with more than 500,000 asylum applications registered in the European Union for the first six months of the year, he said.

‘Climate on impunity’

Germany, which received about a quarter of them alone, criticises the countries of southern Europe for allowing migrants to circulate without processing their asylum applications, but southern states denounce a lack of solidarity of the rest of Europe.

The moves by Germany were condemned by EU allies including Greece and Poland, but Scholz received the perhaps unwelcome accolade of praise from Hungarian right-wing Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Moscow’s closest friend in the European Union, when he declared “welcome to the club”.

The EU Commission’s failure to hold countries to account “only fosters a climate of impunity where unilateral migration policies and practices can proliferate,” said Adriana Tidona, Amnesty International’s Migration Researcher.

But behind the rhetoric, all European states are also aware of the crucial role played by migrants in keeping sectors going including transport and healthcare, as well as the importance of attracting skilled labour.

“Behind the symbolic speeches, European leaders, particularly German ones, remain pragmatic: border controls are targeted,” said Sophie Meiners, a migration researcher with the German Council on Foreign Relations.

Even Meloni’s government has allowed the entry into Italy of 452,000 foreign workers for the period 2023-2025.

“In parallel to this kind of new restrictive measures, they know they need to address skilled labour needs,” she said.

SHOW COMMENTS