SHARE
COPY LINK

OPINION AND ANALYSIS

OPINION: Berlin needs more understanding for people who can’t wear face masks

It's easy to jump to conclusions when we see people breaking the mask-wearing rule. But with some medical conditions making wearing face-coverings almost unbearable, it's high time that Berlin took a more understanding approach, writes David Matthews.

BVG mask sign
A sign for the Berlin transport network BVG informs people of the 3G and mask-wearing rules on-board. Photo: picture alliance/dpa | Carsten Koall

Germany is breathing a cautious but audible sigh of relief. Omicron appears to have peaked without overwhelming hospitals with patients, and at the state and federal level, politicians are now discussing which restrictions should be lifted first. 

Of all the pandemic precautions we’ve gotten used to these past two years, masks are likely to be the last to go. That’s if we ever take them off – it’s possible parts of Europe might follow Japan and make them a social norm on public transport, even after the pandemic has long since faded away.  

During most of the pandemic, I thought of mask-wearing as a no-brainer. I could see why closing restaurants and bars or restricting travel was controversial, but masks? What’s the big deal? They seem to be such a simple, cost-free way of reducing infection, which is why occasional mask-refuseniks on the U-Bahn come across as bafflingly stubborn and anti-social to the rest of us.  

READ ALSO: OPINION: Germany is stuck in Covid Groundhog Day – it’s time to move on

But last December, my eyes were opened to the hidden costs of a masked society when a friend of mine, Hannah Bestley Burt, an artist from London, came to visit Berlin for a long weekend. 

Hannah is autistic, and for her at least, wearing a mask is far from simple – it’s practically impossible. She has problems with sensory processing, and so finds certain clothes, like jeans or items with high necklines, labels or seams, unbearably irritating to wear.

When coronavirus struck, she tried to find a comfortable kind of mask, but they triggered panic attacks. “It’s like having a bright and hot light shone directly in your face, or someone yelling numbers at you while you try to do maths,” says Hannah, whose art deals with her autism. “At best it’s distracting, at worst it is intolerable, it makes me angry, panicked, afraid, I can’t think about anything but its presence on my face.”  

A world of judgement

In London where she lives, this hasn’t been such a problem. There, mask compliance is pretty patchy, and there are regular reminders on public transport that some people are medically incapable of masking up.  

But arriving in Berlin unmasked, Hannah experienced a world of judgement and rejection as she tried to enjoy the city. This was despite bringing a letter from her therapist explaining her autism, and a digital exemption badge from the UK government. 

In one incident, a café initially tried to turn her away, despite having empty tables. In another, she was forced to wear a mask when getting a Covid test in a shopping centre. And when she tried to go to the spa Vabali she was flatly refused entry. I asked Vabali about this, and they simply referred me to their website FAQs, which bluntly says: “face coverings are required”. 

It wasn’t just being turned away that was painful for Hannah; it was the seeming lack of understanding or sympathy in Berlin about her condition. I don’t think the language barrier can be used as an excuse: she was either turned away from these places in English or was accompanied by a fluent German speaker.   

Things weren’t much better on public transport. Generally she tried to avoid it, but when she had to take the U-Bahn, people sometimes tutted, stared and spoke about her.

It don’t want to give the impression the trip was all bad: we managed to go to Christmas markets, bars, restaurants and a nightclub where staff were understanding. 

Public shaming 

But this doesn’t remove the anxiety that in the next café or U-Bahn, you’ll be publicly shamed for not wearing a mask. “I’m an artist and had been considering moving to Berlin, it could be a wonderful move for my practice,” Hannah told me afterwards. “But I realised that I couldn’t live there, I couldn’t have a full life there.”  

How many autistic people are there in Berlin like Hannah, excluded from public spaces through official rules or the glares of strangers? 

It’s impossible to know for sure, but Germany’s Federal Office for the Environment estimates that 0.6 – 1% of people globally have the condition. That would equate to tens of thousands in Berlin alone. 

Of course, many autistic people are able to wear masks without a problem, Bärbel Wohlleben, vice chair of Autism Germany, told me. But the organisation also knows of sufferers who like Hannah simply cannot mask up. “There is not a lot of tolerance,” she said. 

People sit on the Berlin U-Bahn wearing masks

People sit on the Berlin U-Bahn wearing masks. Local transport is often a hotspot for public shaming of perceived ‘mask avoiders’. Photo: picture alliance/dpa | Christoph Soeder

How could Berlin become a little more tolerant? Transport for London regularly reminds passengers that it may not be obvious why someone cannot wear a mask, and sends free exemption badges to passengers who want them, no questions asked. 

I asked BVG if they had considered doing something similar. They told me that they make sure their staff know about Berlin’s mask exemption rules, which do allow you to go maskless if you have a medically certified health impairment, chronic illness or disability. 

Yet they decided not to broadcast public reminders “in order to minimise the risk of abuse” of the rules, a spokesman told me. Reminders would “not entirely solve” the problem of unmasked people getting dirty looks on the U-Bahn, he added. 

READ ALSO: OPINION: The pandemic has revealed Germany’s deep obsession with rules and compliance

A forgiving middle ground

The problem here, as BVG suggests, is that if we don’t tut and stare at unmasked people like Hannah, we also won’t challenge diehard mask refusers who are unmasked for political, not medical reasons. The whole system of social pressure risks collapsing. 

But surely there has to be a more forgiving middle ground where, if it bothers us, we politely ask someone on the U-Bahn why they aren’t wearing a mask, rather than assuming the worst of them. I’ve certainly done my bit of public shaming during the pandemic, staring at a maskless person on the train or tram without knowing their backstory. 

And every café, bar, and restaurant should make sure their staff know that mental health can be a perfectly valid reason not to wear a mask. 

For most of the last two years, I’ve counted my lucky stars that I live in near universally masked, rule-following Berlin, rather than what I thought of as selfish and maskless London. But as we edge back into normality, Hannah’s experience should remind us that for a small but significant minority, masks are far from a harmless measure – they amount to a semi-lockdown of the entire city.

Member comments

  1. “And every café, bar, and restaurant should make sure their staff know that mental health can be a perfectly valid reason not to wear a mask. ”

    I don’t disagree with your statement…but only after a diagnosis by a qualified mental health professional. Otherwise, this becomes a free ticket to not wearing a mask.

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

OPINION AND ANALYSIS

OPINION: After UK and French elections, Germany’s headaches this summer lie at home

With the British and French election results being kind on Germany, the main problems for Berlin this summer will be homegrown, explains Brian Melican.

OPINION: After UK and French elections, Germany's headaches this summer lie at home

It’s a good job that – in contrast to many in Britain’s outgoing Conservative government – I’m not one for political bets.

If I were, I’d have lost a considerable amount of money over the last seven days. That’s because, for the last 10 years or so, I’ve predicated my predictions on Murphy’s maxim of “If it can go wrong, it will go wrong.” Brexit, Trump, rise of the far right: unlike many others, I never kidded myself that it would somehow all turn out alright in the end.

So last week, my money would have been on an electoral upset in the UK (whose voters can be coy about telling the truth to pollsters) and not on an electoral upset in France (where RN looked odds-on to win big). Also, I would definitely have placed a wager on Germany’s tripartite coalition failing to reach an agreement on next year’s budget – and might have had money riding on the government collapsing as a result.

Yet last Thursday saw Britain’s electorate – and, not unimportantly, its electoral system – hand a thumping majority to a sensible government while keeping the hard-right nutjobs at bay. And on Friday morning, it wasn’t just Britain’s leading centrist politicians standing in front of the cameras with satisfied, if somewhat sleep-deprived smiles. Here in Germany, the heads of the SPD, FDP, and Greens had just pulled an all-nighter, too, to reach a compromise on 2025 spending in time for the breakfast news – and ahead of that evening’s football match between Germany and Spain, as Olaf Scholz underlined with his trademark Cheshire cat grin.

READ ALSO: How Germany’s planned 2025 budget could affect you

Schlaf wird überschätzt” – ‘Who needs sleep anyway?’ – beamed the Chancellor. And I would imagine he didn’t get much on Sunday night, either. Even after the first exit polls suggested that, contrary to expectations, the far-right Front – pardon – Rassemblement National wasn’t going to emerge victorious from the second round of the French parliamentary elections, I shouldn’t imagine anyone in the Chancellery felt truly comfortable nodding off until it became clear early this morning that the RN had come third.

Catastrophe averted for Berlin

An RN win would have been a major headache for Scholz et al.: President Macron being forced to charge Jordan Bardella with forming a government would have presented Berlin with a challenge of the same order as dealing with President Trump in Washington or Theresa May/Boris Johnson/Liz Truss in London. In fact, it would have potentially been much worse. It is stated RN policy to take France out of the European electricity market, for instance, and this is something it might have attempted early to show doubters that it meant business.

The result would have been a new energy crisis, potentially spiralling into a run on the Euro, with our government and several others left scrambling to Brussels for a gruelling summer of economic firefighting.

As it turns out, though, Olaf Scholz, Christian Lindner, Robert Habeck and Annalena Baerbock might actually get something approaching a – much needed – summer holiday. At the very least, they’ll be able to focus their energies on preparing for what looks to be a difficult autumn while at least the political weather is warm and sunny.

German Chancellor Olaf Scholz smiles as he attends a question time on July 3, 2024 at the Bundestag (lower house of parliament) in Berlin.

German Chancellor Olaf Scholz smiles as he attends a question time on July 3, 2024 at the Bundestag (lower house of parliament) in Berlin. Photo by RALF HIRSCHBERGER / AFP

London Calling back

Britain, for a start, is back. Even after Brexit, the UK remains, alongside France and Poland, Germany’s most important European ally – especially as Russia’s relentlessness recalibrates long-term foreign-policy priorities away from economic and towards military matters.

The fact that the UK’s new Foreign Secretary David Lammy was here within 48 hours of taking office underscores that Keir Starmer’s new administration understands this – and that there is now potential to rebuild some bridges torn down by Tory intransigence.

Annalena Baerbock will certainly have been relieved that, after dealing first with Liz Truss in her pre-lettuce incarnation, then James (Not-So) Cleverly, and, most recently, David Cameron (“Honey, I blew up the EU!”), she is once again speaking to a British representative with more than half a brain and something resembling a backbone.

READ ALSO: Inside Germany – Budget drama and what Germans think about UK election

Paris ‘en pause’

In France, meanwhile, Berlin will now be waiting for the dust to settle. This dust being French, it will take its time – after all, it will want to join the rest of the country by going on an extended break between 14th July and 15th August (all the more so given that the Olympics are fast approaching).

And for all the breathless commentary on Monday about political pandemonium in Paris after the shock victory of the Nouveau Front Populaire left-wing alliance, Emmanuel Macron is under no immediate constitutional pressure to task anyone with forming an administration. This leaves Matignon in the capable care-taker hands of Gabriel Attal – and anti-German, anti-capitalist, anti-everything lefty loon Jean-Luc Mélenchon is, for all his bombast, not going to be the replacement.

Forming a government will be complex, but by no means impossible given that two third of French MPs are not extremists: parliamentary mathematics will dictate a confidence and supply agreement of some kind. As ever in Paris, after some performative posturing, the most sensible option will prevail. And first, there will be les Grandes Vacances. Whatever government is then installed à la rentrée in September, it will be one Berlin can do business with.

French President Emmanuel Macron

French President Emmanuel Macron. (Photo by Ludovic MARIN / POOL / AFP)

Berlin on a budget

In fact, the only real remaining headache for our government prior to Trump’s inevitable return at the end of the year is, in my estimation, itself.

Yes, the three parties have defied my expectations and the political odds to present a budget compromise, but the agreement is a can of fudge. Yes, I know fudge doesn’t come in cans, so let me explain: that sound you can hear while you read through the coalition’s proposed package is a can being kicked down the road, and that odour is the saccharine smell of sticky political fudge.

Essentially, to get the numbers to work without anyone having to lose face, Scholz, Lindner, and Habeck have used every single accounting trick in the book, from labelling outlay as investment and assuming lower interest with higher growth to repurposing past spending and pushing current outgoings into the fiduciary future.

All of the methods employed are, taken by themselves, perfectly legitimate in the political cut-and-thrust, but there’s a strong chance someone will cry foul.

All the more so since we now have an unexpectedly quiet summer ahead of us and, in politics, the devil makes work for idle hands. Defence Minister Boris Pistorius, forced to accept a €1 billion increase in military spending rather than the €6 billion he’d petitioned for, is grumbling, but seems just about on board. It’s not unlikely, though, that one of the SPD ministers who’s come out with a net decrease in resources will, over the next couple of weeks, find themselves – and a willing journalist – with too much time on their hands. And there’s Rolf Mützenich, head of the parliamentary party, who is audibly angry after being kept out of the loop by Olaf Scholz during negotiations.

Then there are FPD loose cannons like Frank Schäffler and Wolfang Kubicki, always happy to make the headlines with uncharitable comments about coalition partners and with never-ending axes to grind about fiscal stability. And while the Greens, chastened by their recent electoral plunge, will probably keep their head below the parapets, their ministries have suffered some of the worst of the cuts: one of them could potentially surprise me – and everyone else – by going maverick.

Yes, after being caught unprepared by good news over the last few days, I’m expecting to be surprised again at some point this summer – probably by something altogether less positive as Murphy’s Law re-asserts itself and our tripartite coalition gets back into its intolerable habit of agreeing on something only to then disagree about it for months afterwards.

While I think that’s the likely outcome, I hope it’s not what happens. After all, I’m not a betting man.

SHOW COMMENTS