SHARE
COPY LINK

TOURISM

Has Florence banned new Airbnb rentals in the city centre?

Florence city council on Monday approved a ban on further tourist rentals in the historic centre, but the move faces heavy opposition from local landlords and right-wing political parties.

Has Florence banned new Airbnb rentals in the city centre?
Florence, one of Italy's most famous tourist destinations, has fierce competition for apartments - and there are reported attempts to scam house-hunters. (Photo by Alberto PIZZOLI / AFP)

The Tuscan city of Florence moved to ban new Airbnb rentals and other short-term tourist lets on Monday, as the local mayor said too many Florentine residents were being crowded out by visitors or having to live in buildings that resemble “apartment-hotels”.

Mayor Dario Nardella said the city needed local legislation to keep the number of tourist rentals down because government plans to tackle the issue had been “disappointing and inadequate”.

The measures, approved late on Monday, would not impact existing tourist rentals in the city, though they included the offer of a three-year local IMU tax break for landlords of existing short-term rentals who switch to longer-term leases.

READ ALSO: Why are long-term apartment rentals ‘disappearing’ in Italy?

Anyone found to be illegally letting their property could face a fine of up to €5,000 under the new rules,

Nardella said in a speech to a packed city hall on Monday evening that the number of apartments in Florence listed on Airbnb had shot up from 6,000 in 2014 to almost 14,378 today, and that during that time the average cost of monthly residential rents had soared by 42 percent.

This year, prices have increased by 15.1 percent, Nardella said. 

“This means paying at least 500 euros a month for a single room.”

He added: “the 40,000 Florentines who live in the centre are complaining about finding themselves, all of a sudden, living in apartment-hotels.”

READ ALSO: What are Italy’s rules and taxes for Airbnb rentals?

People in many parts of Italy struggle to find an affordable rental due to low salaries and a lack of affordable housing, and in popular tourist destinations like Florence the problem is compounded by a growing preference among landlords for highly profitable short-term lets.

High inflation has further deterred landlords from offering longer-term lease contracts, which in Italy mean the monthly rent cannot be increased for at least four years.

In response to the problem, the Italian government has begun drafting a national law which would require a minimum stay of two nights at rentals in areas which attract a high number of tourists.

Nardella, a member of the centre-left Democratic Party (Partito democratico) which is in opposition at the national level, has long been critical of the government’s plan, saying it wouldn’t have an impact in Florence, where “the minimum average stay is already three nights”.

His council’s move to more tightly regulate short-term lets at a local level meanwhile was opposed by members of the hard-right parties which make up the ruling coalition government.

A representative of the local branch of the Forza Italia party said following the approval that it would appeal against the ban at Florence’s administrative court, national broadcaster Rai reported.

READ ALSO: OPINION: Why more of Italy’s top destinations must limit tourist numbers

Councillors for Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni’s Fratelli d’Italia party described the move as “wrong, untimely and discriminatory,” while the head of the local group of centrist parties said the resolution had come “late, given that the large [investment] groups have already made every possible speculation.”

Meanwhile, Lorenzo Fagnoni, the president of tourist rental business association Property Managers Italia, said a ban on new lets was “a completely incorrect decision that goes against the liberalism of the market” and which “prevents entrepreneurs from establishing themselves in the city”.

In a tweet on Monday, Nardella insisted that the “great majority” of people in Florence were in favour of the measures.

When initially announcing the plans to limit short-term lets in June, Nardella told reporters: “We realise it is a bold regulation, but we know that we can defend it legally.”

While Monday’s announcement, like the previous June announcement, was widely reported in international media as meaning that Florence had banned Airbnb rentals, this doesn’t mean there is any new law in place just yet.

The approved measures will now have 30 days during which “observations” can be made, according to the city council’s website, before they go back in front of councillors for amendments or final approval.

Several other Italian cities also say they plan to restrict the number of short-term lets available in a bid to free up housing and make renting more affordable for residents.

This includes Venice and Milan, where possible limits have long been under discussion – though there’s no sign of them becoming a reality just yet.

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.
For members

TOURISM

‘Not even that ancient’: The harshest TripAdvisor comments about Italy’s sights

From Roman ruins to grand Gothic palaces, Italy’s most popular tourist attractions welcome hundreds of thousands of visitors every year – but not everyone leaves satisfied.

'Not even that ancient': The harshest TripAdvisor comments about Italy's sights

With its rich cultural heritage and plenty of art and architecture wonders, Italy draws hundreds of thousands of visitors from all corners of the world every year. 

But a quick scroll through the review section of travel website TripAdvisor will be enough to show that some of the country’s most famous attractions aren’t to everyone’s taste.

Colosseum, Rome

It may be Italy’s biggest tourist attraction, but even the Colosseum – the largest ancient amphitheatre ever built, dating back to 80 AD – fails to impress some.

“I came. I saw. I left,” wrote one reviewer, saying that looking at pictures of the building and reading about its history will spare you from “a long wait line, a port a john [sic] bathroom, and a big disappointment”.

READ ALSO: Nine tips for making the most of a Rome city break

Others were seemingly not so happy with the overall state of the attraction.

“[It] was a lot more broken than I thought it would be, at £15 a pop you’d think they’d invest in repairing it,” one wrote. 

“Not even got a roof? When they finishing it [sic]?” asked another. 

Milan, Duomo 

Though it is often regarded as one of, if not the greatest example of Italian Gothic architecture, not everyone seems to be impressed by Milan’s Duomo cathedral. 

“The outside is gaudy and tacky as the worst of Las Vegas,” while “the inside is as bad taste as the outside” and not worth the wait, “even if they paid you”, one reviewer wrote.

READ ALSO: Stay away! How Europe’s most popular spots are fighting overtourism

Another said the Duomo was no different than any “old cathedral” found in every European city, claiming that “pigeons watching [sic] is more exciting than this building”.

Speaking of pigeons, one tourist warned future visitors about the aggressiveness of the local bird population, saying that the area surrounding the Duomo is “swarming with thousands of pigeons that have long ago lost any fear of humans” and will “fly directly at your head”, forcing you to “take evasive action”.

Just another cathedral? The famed Duomo in Milan. Photo by Martin Anselmo on Unsplash

Doge’s Palace, Venice

Venice’s Palazzo Ducale is the third most-visited tourist attraction in the country and arguably one of the best-preserved traces of the ancient Venetian Republic’s power. 

But the palace isn’t everyone’s cup of tea – at least judging from its reviews.

“When you go inside, there’s nothing to see except a lot of paintings on the ceilings and high on the walls. The paintings are impressive but very samey,” one reviewer wrote.

READ ALSO: What’s the difference between Italy’s city taxes and new ‘tourist tax’?

“Really boring,” complained another, saying that the rooms were “bland” and “the view never got any better”. 

Other visitors said they were disappointed with some of their tour guides’ choices.

One wrote: “Our guide took pleasure in telling about people being tortured here. It was a bit grizzly [sic]. Personally I would give the place a miss.” 

Tourists sit under the archway of the Doge's Palace in Venice

The Doge’s Palace in Venice, which some visitors found abit “samey”. Photo by Marco BERTORELLO / AFP

Pompeii 

Even the Pompeii archaeological site, which consists of the ruins of a city buried under volcanic ash following the eruption of Mount Vesuvius in 79 AD, has its fair share of detractors.

A reviewer described the site as being “poorly paved street after poorly paved street of pretty much the same old same old terraced house over and over and over and over”.

Another said: “I really don’t get what the hype is about.

“It’s not even that ancient since they had to build so many structures around it to keep it standing. Even the freaking pillars didn’t make it (some barely did I guess).”

One reviewer even went as far as saying it was the “worst place” he’d ever visited, mentioning he had “too much ground to cover in sweltering heat” and he “should have stayed at the nice beaches of Vico Equense”. 

Trevi Fountain, Rome

A prime example of Italian Baroque aesthetics, the Trevi fountain is one of Rome’s most widely recognised symbols worldwide, but not all visitors are impressed by it.

“It splashes and splashes. It spurtles and flows. It fountains and gurgles and is as romantic as my oldest pairs of smelly socks,” wrote one reviewer, who concluded they felt “let down”.

Tourists around Rome's Trevi Fountain

Tourists around Rome’s Trevi Fountain in March 2024. Photo by Alberto PIZZOLI / AFP

That said, many reviewers expressed appreciation for the fountain’s architecture, but complained that their visit was ruined by hordes of fellow tourists. These complaints are far from unjustified given the attraction’s long-standing overcrowding issues

One reviewer suggested that “packing a pair of 8 foot stilts” may be the only way to “ensure a satisfying visit to the Trevi”.

Another called the attraction a “claustrophobia mecca” that’s “nearly impossible to deal with because of the thousands of pushy, sweaty, rude and large tourists”.

Have you seen a surprising review of an Italian landmark? Are there any Italian sights you think are overrated? Let us know in the comments section below.

SHOW COMMENTS