SHARE
COPY LINK
For members

SWISS CITIZENSHIP

Could your political views bar you from becoming a Swiss citizen?

Switzerland has strict naturalisation criteria, but can your bid for citizenship be turned down if your views are not deemed to be ‘politically correct’?

Could your political views bar you from becoming a Swiss citizen?
You can believe whatever you want, as long as your beliefs are not radical. Photo by Fabrice COFFRINI / AFP

This may seem like an extreme rule in a democratic country, but countries can take a stand against views or behaviour. 

In neighbouring Germany a number of politicians, including the Justice Minister, want to tighten the requirements on the country’s upcoming citizenship reforms regarding anti-Semitism. Marco Buschmann, of the FDP, says that those found to harbour anti-Semitic motives would be ineligible for German citizenship under the planned new law.

READ ALSO: German Justice Minister calls to ban ‘antisemites’ from becoming citizens

The leader of the opposition Christian Democrats in Germany has even gone as far as proposing that the citizenship reforms should include a formal requirement for immigrants to recognise Israel’s right to exist as a prerequisite for German citizenship.

Currently, the draft law states that naturalisation is out of the question in Germany if the foreigner “shows by his or her behaviour that he or she does not accept the equal rights of men and women laid down in the Basic Law”.

These can include “anti-Semitic, racist, xenophobic or other inhumanely motivated actions incompatible with the human dignity guarantee of the Basic Law”.

Can this happen in Switzerland as well?

In this respect, the two countries differ, at least from a historical perspective.

Because of Nazi Germany’s persecution and genocide of millions of Jews, politicians in Germany may feel a need to compensate for this historical wrong.

Switzerland, on the other hand, doesn’t feel the same sense of responsibility — even though some historians claim the country was tough in its treatment of Jews seeking refuge in Switzerland during WWII, by denying them entry (which the Swiss refute).

Apart from the historical  component, however, it is highly unlikely that Switzerland would follow Germany’s lead in this regard.

This is why

Candidates for Swiss naturalisation must fulfil a number of requirements, such as the length of stay in the country, language proficiency, and integration, among other criteria.

However, Swiss constitution guarantees the freedom of belief, also referred to as ‘freedom of conscience’, to all residents — including foreigners who live in the country.

This provision includes the right to have one’s own political opinions.

While naturalisation commissions have been known to ask applicants some arbitrary questions, supposedly to judge their level of integration  — for example, about what animals live in a local zoo — they cannot ask any personal questions, apart from those needed to ascertain the candidate’s suitability.

Therefore, it is permissible for naturalisation authorities to want to know about how you and your family have integrated into your local community, what hobbies / activities you are involved in, or why you would like to become a Swiss citizen in the first place.   

However, enquiring about your political views, religion, or sexual orientation, is not permitted (and you should not answer such questions if asked).

By the same token, authorities cannot force you to adopt any particular beliefs.

That would be unconstitutional. The only way this could be allowed would be if legal basis for such a measure were created.

However, there are some exceptions

If there is proof that you sympathise with (or a member of) organisations that Switzerland considers to be terrorist, then you will not be granted citizenship.

These extremist groups, which include Al-Qaeda and the Islamic State (ISIS), are banned in Switzerland.

At present time, Hamas, which is responsible for initial attacks on Israel in September, is not designated as a terrorist organisation in Switzerland, though this is likely to change soon, as parliamentary pressure to do so is mounting.

So while the government cannot force any political beliefs on you, it does expect its citizens (or candidates for citizenship) not to hold extremist views which could endanger Switzerland’s security.

In fact, if you are a dual citizen, the government can revoke your Swiss passport if your “conduct is seriously detrimental to Switzerland’s interests or reputation”.

One example of when such a drastic and irrevocable step can be taken is in the case of people convicted of war crimes, treason, or terrorism.
 
 READ ALSO: Can Swiss citizenship be revoked – and can you get it back?

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

SWISS CITIZENSHIP

‘Great transport, unfriendly service’: New Swiss citizen assesses life in Switzerland

A new Swiss citizen has inspired lively online debate with bold declarations that British cheese is better than Swiss cheese, the service is unfriendly and that the locals wear too many clothes. Share your reaction in the comments below.

'Great transport, unfriendly service': New Swiss citizen assesses life in Switzerland

Jenny Chase, a solar energy analyst for BloombergNEF who lives in the canton of Solothurn, shared her thoughts on the process of becoming Swiss and life in her adopted country after she and her family were were recently granted Swiss citizenship. 

She took to social media site X (formerly Twitter) to announce that after taking 4 years to become Swiss it was time to reveal her views of Switzerland.

“Since I cannot be refused citizenship now, it is time to say what I *really* think of this country,” she wrote.

The post gained over 13 million views, 55 000 likes and prompted hundreds replies, perhaps unsurprisingly given the somewhat controversial (and often humorous) nature of some her thoughts. Many of them struck a chord with other foreigners in Switzerland.

The thread wasn’t solely limited to slice-of-life observations. Jenny also discussed the process of becoming a Swiss citizen, highlighting how the mandatory courses in her canton forced her to really consider why she was choosing to do so. 

“The citizenship process (in canton Solothurn) is 25 hours of courses designed to make you think about why you are doing this and prepare you for two exams and multiple interviews. And also to make you deeply examine what *you* are good for and why a country would want you.”

Although she admitted the real reason for becoming Swiss was slightly more practical and probably one many readers will understand.

“Really the answer to “why am I doing this” is “got a boyfriend, didn’t I, and he wouldn’t leave his job for me,” she said.

She listed some positive things about Switzerland including public transport, the planning that goes into apartment building, the fact Switzerland is child-friendly (although not everyone agreed “until you child makes cries or makes a noise”, responded one) and that richer people pay higher driving fines than poorer drivers.

Among the “bad things about Switzerland” she listed the low tax rates and high salaries “acting as brain drain on surrounding countries” and Switzerland’s “self-serving neutrality”.

She also blasted the unfriendly service.

“Swiss service in restaurants or shops outside cities is usually unfriendly unless you’re a regular. They are doing you a favour by selling you their product. It’s nice that they don’t need the money that much. But as a newcomer, it takes some adjustment,” she said.

Jenny controversially began her thread: “Britain’s cheese and beer are *much* better than those of Switzerland, and it’s not even close. Also, British tea may be made of floor sweepings. Still, at least we pour hot water directly onto it instead of serving as a cup of lukewarm water with a sad teabag on the side.”

Naturally, this opinion prompted some controversy. 

User @Philkellr responded: “I’ve read many offending tweets today, but this pushes all my buttons. Excuse me, sir? What are you comparing UK cheeses against? If it’s Emmentaler. Alright. But nothing beats Gruyere.”

@hal_torto echoed their outrage: “I’m calling every authority in Switzerland to ask for your citizenship to be revoked on grounds of thought crimes.”

Jenny’s opinions weren’t limited to foodstuffs. She also had views on the Swiss tendency to wear multiple heavy layers well into the warmer months of spring. 

“Older Swiss people wear heavy clothes all spring and stare if you don’t. I guess those who herded cows up the mountain dressed for a sunny morning eventually died in an afternoon snowstorm. But for a walk around the village, it’s overkill”, she posted.

Jenny also reflected that the Swiss were “really serious” about democracy.

“They vote on everything – and seem to be making it work. People do not just vote in their own short-term best interests, and the voter information package is a serious attempt to *inform*”, she wrote. 

This prompted several responses, with some reminding Jenny how women were granted the vote in Switzerland relatively recently. 

User @lisabethsparkle replied: “On our honeymoon in Lauterbrunnen in ’85 everything shut down on voting day and we learned women only achieved the right in ’71. That astonished me!”

@Gabalicious01 also retorted, “How democratic can a country that didn’t let women vote until the 1970s really be? Please don’t get arrogant about how well a tiny, wealthy country with a largely homogeneous population does democracy. It’s much harder to give everyone a voice with 341 million people and vast diversity.

Concluding her thread, Jenny clarified that her path to Swiss citizenship had included ten years of residency in the country before she could apply and that she was married to a Swiss citizen, which expedited the process. 

The entire thread, including Jenny’s follow-up answers to reader questions, can be found here

Is she right? Share you own reaction to Jenny’s views in the comments section below.

SHOW COMMENTS