SHARE
COPY LINK

DISCRIMINATION

What is Germany’s Islam conference and why is it controversial?

A two-day conference focussed on Germany's Muslim community is being held in Berlin - but this year there are some notable absences. Here's what you need to know about the event and why Islamic groups say they've been sidelined.

A mosque in Berlin
A mosque in Berlin holds an event on the 'Day of the Open Mosque' on October 3rd, 2023. Photo: picture alliance/dpa | Fabian Sommer

What’s going on?

When Germany’s Interior Ministry released the agenda for its annual Islam Conference this year, there appeared to be one notable exception: barely any Islamic groups were represented or involved in the discussions over the two-day event.

The speakers involved in the panel discussions at the conference primarily consist of German academics and government representatives. In contrast, only one representative of an Islamic association – the Maliki Community Alliance – will be featured on the the podium on the second day of the event.

“We see that an event is currently taking place that deals with anti-Semitism and anti-Muslim hostility and none of the major associations are on the podium or have been included in the event,” Burhan Kesici, chairman of the Islamic Council, told German media outlet Tagesschau, adding that this year’s event had bypassed Muslims almost entirely.

“There is always a requirement that Muslim associations should actively participate, but how can you do that if you are just a spectator, so to speak.”

According to the government, invites were sent out to some Muslim groups to attend as audience members, along with representatives from Jewish groups, the Church, academia and civil society. 

However, in light of tensions stoked by the Israel-Hamas war, some prominent Muslim groups were specifically excluded. 

This includes Germany’s Central Council of Muslims (ZRM), who stand accused of not condemning the attack on Israel clearly enough.

Speaking to RBB24, Aiman Mazyek, head of the Muslim Council, expressed surprise that the organisation was not invited, stating: “Exchange is needed right now.”

“On the one hand, it is about condemning extremism like the Hamas terror on October 7th and, on the other hand, making it clear that the war in Gaza and the Israeli bombardment must not continue,” Mazyek said. Violence from Israel would only fuel an increase in terrorism, he said. 

Nevertheless, the organisation says it will continue its work of “moderation” and tackling “dehumanisation”, including anti-Semitism, regardless of whether it participates in the conference. 

What is the conference and why is it controversial?

Though the Islam conference may sound like a community-led initiative, it was actually founded by former Interior Minister Wolfgang Schäuble, of the centre-right Christian Democrats (CDU) back in 2006 as a security project aimed at fighting terrorism.

In the past 17 years, however, the event has metamorphosed significantly and recent topics have included religious education in schools, pastoral care in prisons, Islamic welfare and the problem of state-appointed Imams. The topic of Imams was the focus of last year’s event, which was the first conference organised in this legislative period.

READ ALSO: Eight things to know about Islam in Germany

This year, however, the Interior Ministry was sharply criticised for selecting Islamophobia as a topic of discussion. According to Tagesschau, one Dutch immigration researcher, Ruud Koopmans, wrote a letter to the Ministry rejecting an invitation to sit on a panel related to anti-Muslim hate.

“We are currently not living in times in which anti-Muslim sentiment appears to be the central problem,” he said, adding that the choice of topic was “unfortunate, or even inappropriate”. 

In light of the backlash, the Ministry hastily added anti-Semitism onto the agenda in order to acknowledge the recent rise in anti-Semitic hate.

Mathias Rohe, who coordinated the Independent Expert Group on Islamophobia, said he understood the addition but was concerned about Muslim and Jewish groups being played off against each other.

According to the latest statistics, both anti-Semitic and Islamophobic incidents have risen sharply in the aftermath of the October 7th terrorist attacks by Hamas.

In 2023 alone, there have been dozens of attacks on mosques, including reports of faeces and pork being delivered to the religious centres. 

Of more than 81 attacks, more than half were carried out since October 7th. 

“Many Muslims in our country are unsettled, afraid to speak out at all, and feel intimidated by the debate,” said head of the Muslim Council Aiman Mazyek, adding that people who had lost loved ones in Gaza should be allowed to express their feelings without being labelled supporters of Hamas.

What has the government been saying?

Speaking on broadcaster ARD on Tuesday, Faeser became the latest politician to urge Muslim groups in Germany to explicitly condemn the deadly Hamas attacks and to voice solidarity with Israel.

“I expect the Muslim organisations to clearly position themselves and uphold their responsibilities in society,” Faeser said.

The groups need to “clearly condemn” the attack by Hamas and not just with a “yes, but”, she said.

“It must be very clear. We stand by Israel’s side,” added Faeser.

Some Muslim groups have indeed “lived up to their responsibilities”, she said. “Some have not.” The voices “defending our values” must get louder, said the minister.

READ ALSO: German police raid scores of properties in fight against anti-Semitism

However, in comments made at the Islam conference, Faeser said claims of anti-Semitism should not be used to stoke divisions.

“Those who are now creating a mood against Muslims under the pretext of fighting anti-Semitism want to divide and not unite us,” she said. 

Islamic conference Nancy Faeser

Interior Minister Nancy Faeser (SPD) speaks at the Islamic Conference on Tuesday. Photo: picture alliance/dpa | Britta Pedersen

Faeser’s comments come after weeks of rising tensions in the wake of the Israel-Hamas war and increasing suspicion towards the some 5.5 million Muslims who live in Germany. 

In the October 7th terrorist attacks, Hamas gunmen killed at least 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and took more than 120 hostages with them into Gaza, the majority of whom have not been released.

In retaliation, Israel launched a brutal bombing campaign and ground offensive in Gaza in which more than 13,300 Palestinians have died so far, including at least 5,600 children, according to statistics from the Hamas-run health ministry that are deemed reliable by the UN. 

With Israel carrying out attacks on hospitals in the Gaza Strip – which they have claimed are Hamas bases – and continuing to choke off supplies of water, food and medicine in the region, the humanitarian crisis in the area has also worsened dramatically in recent weeks. 

Germany’s foreign population has been singled out several times as an alleged source of anti-Semitic hate and anti-Israel sentiment in the country. 

This led to the government aiming to tighten up rules around anti-Semitism in its forthcoming reform of dual nationality and citizenship rules.

Speaking at the Islamic conference, Faeser said everyone in Germany had a special responsibility to protect Jewish life. “Anyone who becomes a citizenship of our country has to know what this means for them personally,” she said. 

READ ALSO: Could Germany strip citizenship rights from foreigners over anti-Semitism?

Why is anti-Semitism being treated as a ‘foreign’ problem?

In the early days of the Israel-Hamas war, German police moved to ban a number of planned protests in solidarity with Palestinians, including a Berlin demo organised by a Jewish group, “Jewish Voices for Just Peace in the Near East”.

Other unofficial pro-Palestinian gatherings – and particularly those in areas with a high migrant population – were labelled “Hamas rallies” in the German press. 

More recently, however, larger pro-Palestine demonstrations have been allowed to take place in many major German cities. These marches have mostly been peaceful, though there has also been violence and arrests over anti-Semitic acts. 

In a recent visit by Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan to Germany, the authoritarian leader clashed with Chancellor Olaf Scholz (SPD) after claiming that Israel was a “terror state” and Hamas were “liberators” fighting for their land. 

People march in solidarity with Palestine in Wuppertal

People march in solidarity with Palestine in Wuppertal, North Rhine-Westphalia. Photo: picture alliance/dpa | Christoph Reichwein

This help to fuel existing perceptions that the Turkish community are the most fervently pro-Palestine within Germany. 

Last month, Economics Minister Robert Habeck (Greens) recorded a viral video where he described the security of Israel as Germany’s “Staatsräson”, or state purpose, and also singled out migrant and Muslim groups to explicitly condemn the Hamas attacks. 

READ ALSO: Vice chancellor calls for end of anti-Semitism in Germany in viral video

Politicians from the right-wing CDU have also blamed Muslim immigrants from Africa and the Near and Middle East for a rise in anti-Semitic attacks, describing these areas as breeding grounds for Jewish hate and labelling anti-Semitism an “imported” problem. 

This is despite the fact that the vast majority of anti-Semitic attacks – including a recently thwarted plan by a radicalised 18 year old – are carried out by Germany’s far-right. 

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.
For members

POLITICS

ANALYSIS: What’s at stake in Germany’s eastern state elections?

After success in Thuringia and Saxony, the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) may well come in first in another eastern state election this Sunday. We spoke with a political scientist to analyse what's at stake as Brandenburg goes to the polls.

ANALYSIS: What's at stake in Germany's eastern state elections?

German politics’ “eastern September” is set to finally end Sunday – with more ruminations and reflections likely to come about the recent fortunes of the far-right AfD at the ballot box.

If current polls are anything to go by, the AfD could come in first in the eastern state encircling Berlin – which counts Potsdam as its capital.

After overtaking the governing Social Democrats (SPD) in a recent shock poll, the party is currently at around 28 percent, compared to the SPD on 25 percent. The centre-right Christian Democrats come in at 16 percent in the latest poll and the left-populist Sarah Wagenknecht Alliance (BSW) – named after its founder – charts in at 14 percent.

The remaining parties come in much lower – with the Greens, Left and liberal Free Democrats all facing possible ejection from the state parliament.

Another victory for the AfD – or even a strong showing should the SPD still manage a narrow surprise win – will certainly boost the far-right’s confidence, after it came in first in Thuringia and second in Saxony earlier this month, following state elections that saw all three of Germany’s federally governing parties take massive losses.

Thuringia and Saxony results will likely hang over Brandenburg on Sunday – with Germany’s governing parties, many everyday Germans, and foreigners all watching with some trepidation. Here’s what to watch out for following the Brandenburg result.

READ ALSO: ‘Political earthquake’ – What the far-right AfD state election win means for Germany 

A newly confident AfD insists it must be part of government

The AfD has repeatedly argued that it must be considered as a possible coalition partner to join German governments – whether at the federal, state, or local level. 

“There are no politics without the AfD,” its co-leader Tino Chrupalla said following the Thuringia results. However, all other parties have explicitly refused to work with the AfD to form a governing coalition – meaning that as high as its results this month have been, they fall well short of the absolute majority that would be required to govern alone.

READ ALSO: ‘We need change’: Germany’s far-right eyes power after state election win

However, its getting more difficult to form coalitions to keep the AfD out, with the centre-right CDU in Thuringia even open to governing with the leftwing populist BSW after mainstream parties like the Greens and FDP were thrown out of state parliament entirely.

University of Mainz political scientist Kai Arzheimer, who specialises in the German far-right, says whether the far-right ever get into a German government or not depends mostly on whether – and how – the CDU is willing to work with the AfD.

Thuringia election results on a screen

People watch the first exit polls results for Thuringia’s state elections come in at the State Parliament in Erfurt on September 1st, 2024. Photo by Joerg CARSTENSEN / AFP

“For the time being, it should be able to form coalitions against the AfD, even if they are rather awkward,” says Arzheimer, who adds that even the different regional chapters of the CDU may have different opinions about working with the AfD.

“Within the eastern state parties of both the CDU and the FDP, there seems to be some appetite for coming to an arrangement with the AfD. While a formal coalition would probably split either party, we have already seen some tentative moves towards an informal cooperation.”

Ultimately, the Brandmauer or “firewall” concept in German politics – in which all other parties refuse to work with the AfD – may end up coming under increasing stress on the back of eastern state election results, where governing with the far-right no longer becomes unthinkable.

READ ALSO: EXPLAINED: Could the far-right AfD ever take power in Germany?

What the mainstream parties take from eastern election results

It’s probably no coincidence that Germany’s ruling government decided to re-institute border controls at its land borders with other EU states shortly after the AfD topped the Thuringia state poll, according to Arzheimer, who says the elections are just the latest in a number of things at work when if comes to Germany’s migration debate.

“The border controls, the plans for the stricter enforcement of repatriation orders, and most of all the government’s harsher rhetoric are as much a reaction to Saxony and Thuringia as they are an attempt to control the fallout from the Solingen knife attack and a response to the whole ‘debate’ on immigration,” he says.

“Many experts seem to agree that they are neither practical nor that useful, and introducing them more or less overnight smacks of a degree of panic.”

READ ALSO: Should foreign residents in Germany be concerned about far-right AfD win?

Polls conducted following the election found that migration and internal security issues were big drivers of the AfD vote – despite these being issues for the national, rather than regional, government. 

Of the AfD voters in Thuringia, more than 70 percent said either migration or crime and internal security played the largest role in influencing their vote. Slightly less than ten percent said social security. Despite the AfD’s pro-Russian views, only three percent of AfD voters in Thuringia said Germany’s support of Ukraine decisively influenced their votes.

Besides the mainstream parties like the SPD reacting with spur-of-the-moment migration policies, the Brandenburg result may end up putting pressure on Chancellor Olaf Scholz from within his own SPD.

Brandenburg SPD’s Dietmar Woidke may still be able to hold onto the premiership, but he has said he will resign if he doesn’t beat the AfD outright. Should he lose, calls may grow louder within the SPD for Scholz to resign himself – or at least declare that he won’t stand as a chancellor candidate again.

READ ALSO: How an explosive row over immigration has divided Germany

SHOW COMMENTS