SHARE
COPY LINK
For members

BERLIN

Is Berlin planning to build flats on the famous Tempelhofer Feld?

The CDU-led government in Berlin is putting the controversial issue of building flats on Tempelhof airfield back on the agenda. Could it lead to another referendum?

A cyclist in Berlin's Tempelhof field
A cyclist in Berlin's Tempelhof field. Photo: picture alliance/dpa | Monika Skolimowska

What’s happening?

The centre-right Christian Democratic Union (CDU) in Berlin is exploring new options for using ‘Tempelhofer Feld’ as a site for new housing. Specifically, it wants to hold a new referendum on designating certain parts of the former 360-hectare airfield-turned-green space for housing construction. 

German public broadcaster RBB was the first to report on the results of a closed-door meeting held by the Berlin CDU parliamentary group in Warsaw over the weekend. Among other topics, the Christian Democrat deputies passed a paper confirming their intention to put the issue of building on Tempelhof to a public vote.

In doing so, the ruling CDU-led coalition, with the Social Democrats (SPD) as the junior partner, is reviving an issue that many thought was done and dusted.

In 2014, a citizens’ initiative succeeded in thwarting the Senate’s plans to designate certain sections of the field for construction projects. 64 percent of voters rejected the proposal, ensuring that the entire field would be preserved. This commitment is now beginning to crumble.

READ ALSO: Berlin voters reject Tempelhof development

Why is the CDU reviving the issue?

After winning the Berlin state elections in February this year, the new CDU mayor, Kai Wegner, announced his intention to reopen the Tempelhof issue.

Dirk Stettner, head of the Berlin CDU parliamentary group, told RBB, that this is because the housing situation in Berlin is drastically different now compared to 2014.

“There is an unprecedented demand,” he added, referring to the severe housing crisis the city is currently facing. In light of this, new options for creating housing have to be considered, he said.

Kai Wegner (CDU) arrives at the Rotes Rathaus

Berlin mayor Kai Wegner (CDU). Photo: picture alliance/dpa/dpa Pool | Christoph Soeder

This second attempt to develop the parkland also became part of the coalition agreement that Wegner’s Christian Democrats signed with ex-mayor Franziska Giffey’s Social Democrats. But while the coalition agreement spoke only of a “re-evaluation” of the possibility by the population, the CDU is now pushing forward with a more concrete proposal. 

What remains unclear is whether a political party can bypass the collection of signatures usually required to initiate a referendum. If the CDU’s approach is deemed inadmissible, Stettner advocates finding other ways for citizens to participate in the issue.

Similarly, Wegner’s government hasn’t presented any clear plans for the extent to which they want to determine the limits of space for housing projects. The two coalition partners have frequently floated the term “behutsame Randbebauung”, which can be translated as a “careful development at the edges” of Tempelhofer Feld. 

CDU politician Christian Gräff holds that the outskirts of the airfield are already covered in concrete, such that a construction plan that would leave much of the green space intact would be possible. 

“We are talking about a careful development.” SPD minister for urban planning, Christian Gaebler, told RBB24 Abendschau.

“It will have to be done in such a way that the current functions of the field for providing leisure and regulating the city climate remain intact.”

What measures have already been taken?

In 2014, the successful campaign against further construction at Tempelhof Feld was enshrined in state law.

But two years later, the law was amended for the first time to allow the construction of a temporary refugee shelter on the northern edge of the site. According to the current legislation, the container settlement can only remain in place until 2025. 

In order to circumvent this restriction, the Berlin government decided last week to further amend the law. In addition to extending the lease for accommodating refugees until 2028, the new law will allow for the expansion of the shelter.

Critics fear that the amendment could set a precedent for further real estate development at Tempelhofer Feld.

However Stettner denies these allegations. “Developing the edges of Tempelhof is another topic that has nothing to do with the amended law,” he told RBB.

So what happens next? That remains unclear. But it’s fair to say that many Berliners will be watching this story closely. 

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

POLITICS

‘Dexit’ would cost Germany 690 billion euros and millions of jobs: economists

According to the German Economic Institute (IW), Germany's exit from the EU – the so-called Dexit – would cost millions of jobs and significantly reduce the country's prosperity.

'Dexit' would cost Germany 690 billion euros and millions of jobs: economists

In a study presented by the Cologne-based institute on Sunday, the authors showed that a Dexit would cause real GDP to drop by 5.6 percent after just five years. This means that Germany would lose 690 billion euros in value creation during this time.

In addition, Germany as an export nation is dependent on trade with other countries, especially with other EU countries, warned the authors. Companies and consumers in Germany would therefore feel the consequences “clearly” and around 2.5 million jobs would be lost.

The study is based on the consequences of Britain’s exit from the EU, such as the loss of trade agreements and European workers.

Taken together, the losses in economic output in Germany in the event of a Dexit would be similar to those seen during Covid-19 and the energy cost crisis in the period from 2020 to 2023, the authors warned.

Brexit is therefore “not an undertaking worth imitating,” warned IW managing director Hubertus Bardt. Rather, Brexit is a “warning for other member states not to carelessly abandon economic integration.”

Leader of the far-right AfD party Alice Weidel described Great Britain’s exit from the European Union at the beginning of the year as a “model for Germany.”

In an interview published in the Financial Times, Weidel outlined her party’s approach in the event her party came to power: First, the AfD would try to resolve its “democratic deficit” by reforming the EU. If this was not successful, a referendum would be called on whether Germany should remain in the EU.

SHOW COMMENTS