SHARE
COPY LINK

MIGRANT CRISIS

Albanians question Italy’s ‘solidarity’ amid controversial migration deal

Albania's prime minister has said the solidarity Italy showed to his country in the '90's is the reason why he agreed to sign a controversial migration pact with Rome. But is this the full story, or just an 'advertising gimmick'?

Nearly 1,000 desperate Albanians stand aboard an abandoned ship on March 17, 1997, waiting for a possible departure for Italy.
Nearly 1,000 desperate Albanians stand aboard an abandoned ship on March 17, 1997, waiting for a possible departure for Italy. Photo by ERIC CABANIS / AFP.

On February 20, 1991, demonstrators in Tirana pulled down the immense statue of Albanian dictator Enver Hoxha, marking the end of the communist regime and sparking an emigration wave towards Italy.

Three decades later, Albanian Prime Minister Edi Rama says the “solidarity” Italy showed to his compatriots at the time is why he signed up to a controversial migration deal with Rome in November.

The Albanian community in Italy today is large – the second biggest from a non-EU country – and well-integrated.

But it has not always been, and critics accuse Rama of rewriting history.

READ ALSO: Italy approves controversial Albanian migrant deal

Hajri Kurti, who emigrated to Italy to escape poverty, says “integration was very difficult”.

“You were an illegal immigrant, you had no rights, you worked illegally. Sometimes I didn’t get paid”, the 50-year-old told AFP.

A banner reads “I’m an Albanian without legal status, all the same I cheer for Italy” at the Euro 2008 Championships Group C football match France vs. Italy in Zurich. Photo by JOHN MACDOUGALL / AFP.

“You had to be invisible. I was afraid when I saw a policeman in the street,” he said.

Now a partner in a maintenance company, it took the married father-of-one years to win the right to stay.

“There are prejudices, there is racism” in Italian society, he said.

Betrayal

Italy, barely 70 kilometres (40 miles) across the Adriatic Sea from Albania, was seen as a Western country rich in opportunities.

Thousands of Albanians who arrived in March 1991 in the southern Italian port of Brindisi were welcomed warmly, said Edmond Godo, head of the Albanian cultural association Besa.

READ ALSO: How has Italy’s ‘anti-immigrant’ government changed the rules for foreigners?

The 57-year-old recalls how many locals left food for the new arrivals outside their front doors, including one young woman who opened her home to him.

“She invited me and my two friends to lunch, and after hearing the history of my country, she and her husband invited us to stay and sleep at their place,” he told AFP.

But some 20,000 other Albanians who arrived in August of the same year in Bari, a port just north of Brindisi, were not so lucky.

Albanians arrive in Brindisi on March 15, 1997 after crossing the Adriatic sea from Durres in Albania onboard the “Val Frio.” Photo by GERARD JULIEN / AFP.

The desperate migrants crowded onto their boat, the Vlora, were front-page news and the government feared more mass arrivals would follow.

After being detained for several days in a stadium in the city, the vast majority of them were repatriated.

The Albanians had been told they were being sent to another Italian city, and their forced return instead was seen as a betrayal.

By 1997, Italy had imposed a naval blockade on Albania, and Italian navy boats patrolled its waters.

The same year, more than 80 Albanians died or went missing after an Albanian ship carrying more than 120 people collided with an Italian navy vessel.

‘Advertising gimmick’

These are not memories Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni or Rama want to dwell on.

Hard-right Meloni, elected in 2022 on an anti-migrant ticket, has pledged to slash the number of migrant boats arriving in Italy and needs to be seen to be tackling the issue, though these days the boats are no longer coming from Albania but mainly from North Africa.

Rama wants Rome to help speed up Albania’s entry into the European Union.

Italy’s Prime Minister, Giorgia Meloni and Albania’s Prime Minister Edi Rama sign an agreement on migration at Palazzo Chigi in Rome on November 6, 2023. Photo by Tiziana FABI / AFP.

Under the deal, Italy will open two centres in Albania to process people intercepted as they attempt to cross the central Mediterranean.

The centres will only be able to accommodate up to 3,000 people at a time while their asylum requests are being evaluated – often a lengthy process.

That is but a fraction of yearly arrivals. In 2023, over 150,000 people crossed from North Africa to Italy.

The plan has also been criticised by migrant rescue charities as likely to infringe international law.

For Albanian emigrant Kurti, the deal is little more than “an advertising gimmick”, intended to “mask the incapacity of the Italian government” to manage migrant flows.

By AFP’s Ljubomir MILASIN

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

MIGRANT CRISIS

Italy joins countries calling for asylum centres outside EU

Italy is one of 15 EU member states who have sent a joint letter to the European Commission demanding a further tightening of the bloc's asylum policy, which will make it easier to transfer undocumented migrants to third countries, such as Rwanda, including when they are rescued at sea.

Italy joins countries calling for asylum centres outside EU

The countries presented their joint stance in a letter dated May 15th to the European Commission, which was made public on Thursday.

It was sent less than a month before European Parliament elections across the 27-nation European Union, in which far-right anti-immigration parties are forecast to make gains.

Italy, Austria, Bulgaria, Cyprus, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, Estonia, Greece, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, the Netherlands, Poland and Romania signed the letter.

In it, they ask the European Union’s executive arm to “propose new ways and solutions to prevent irregular migration to Europe”.

They want the EU to toughen its asylum and migration pact, which introduces tighter border controls and seeks to expedite the deportation of rejected asylum-seekers.

The pact, to be operational from 2026, will speed up the vetting of people arriving without documents and establish new border detention centres.

The 15 countries also want to see mechanisms to detect and intercept migrant boats and take them “to a predetermined place of safety in a partner country outside the EU, where durable solutions for those migrants could be found”.

They said it should be easier to send asylum seekers to third countries while their requests for protection are assessed.

They cited as a model a controversial deal Italy has struck with Albania, under which thousands of asylum-seekers picked up at sea can be taken to holding camps in the non-EU Balkan country as their cases are processed.

READ ALSO: Italy approves controversial Albanian migrant deal

The European Commission said it would study the letter, though a spokeswoman, Anitta Hipper, added that “all our work and focus is set now on the implementation” of the migration and asylum pact.

Differences with UK-Rwanda model

EU law says people entering the bloc without documents can be sent to an outside country where they could have requested asylum – so long as that country is deemed safe and the applicant has a genuine link with it.

That condition differentiates it from a scheme set up by non-EU Britain under which irregular arrivals will be denied the right to request asylum in the UK and sent instead to Rwanda.

Rights groups accuse the African country – ruled with an iron fist by President Paul Kagame since the end of the 1994 genocide that killed around 800,000 people – of cracking down on free speech and political opposition.

The 15 nations said they want the EU to make deals with third countries along main migration routes, citing the example of the arrangement it made with Turkey in 2016 to take in Syrian refugees fleeing war.

Camille Le Coz, associate director of the Migration Policy Institute, a think tank, said: “In legal terms, these models pose many questions and are very costly in terms of resource mobilisation and at the operational level.”

The opening date for migrant reception centres in Albania set up under the deal with Italy had been delayed, she noted.

With the June 6th-9th EU elections leading to a new European Commission, the proposals put forward by the 15 countries would go into the inbox of the next commission for it to weigh them, she said.

She also noted that EU heavyweights France, Germany and Spain had not signed onto the letter.

“For certain member countries, the priority really is the implementation of the pact, and that in itself is already a huge task,” Le Coz said.

SHOW COMMENTS