SHARE
COPY LINK

NATO

‘Worth the wait’: Swedish troops relish NATO leap

Swedish marines on Friday peered out from their assault vessel as part of a vast NATO military exercise to simulate repelling an invasion of neighbouring Norway.

Swedish Air Force officer Lieutenant General Carl-Johan Edstrom, currently serving as the Chief of Joint Operations for the Swedish Armed Forces, is pictured during the Nordic Response 24 military exercise
Swedish Air Force officer Lieutenant General Carl-Johan Edstrom, currently serving as the Chief of Joint Operations for the Swedish Armed Forces, is pictured during the Nordic Response 24 military exercise on March 8, 2024, in Alta, above the Arctic Circle in Norway. (Photo by Jonathan NACKSTRAND / AFP)

After a ceremony in Washington less than 24 hours earlier, the troops marked their country’s first full day as a member of the US-led alliance after two centuries of non-alignment.

Sweden’s push to join — along with that of Finland — was sparked two years ago by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

Opposition from first Turkey and later Hungary held up Stockholm’s entry for months longer than other allies hoped.

“I think it was definitely worth the wait,” combat boat commander Karl-Johan Ryden, 21, told AFP, as he watched over the frigid Arctic waters.

“It’s been a long process,” weighed in Major Joakim Sjorgren. “But we always figured it’s going to be a yes, some way along the way. So we’ve been prepared for it.” 

READ ALSO: How will joining Nato change the daily lives of people in Sweden?

The Nordic Response exercise — part of NATO’s biggest drills since the Cold War — is far from the first time Swedish troops have trained with alliance members.

Sweden has for years been a close partner of NATO and worked with its Nordic neighbours on defence.

But now Stockholm has taken the giant leap of becoming the 32nd member of the club of nations bound together by their Article 5 commitment to defend each other.

“I would say that for the tactical level, on the unit level, for soldiers and officers, this is not that big of a change because we have been training with NATO and having operations with NATO since the early 2000s,” Sweden’s
commander for joint operations Carl-Johan Edstrom, one of the country’s top officers, told AFP.

“But for Sweden in general it’s a big change. It’s the biggest change for 200 years — it’s a mental shift.”

‘New era’ 

Senior Norwegian military commander Vice Admiral Rune Andersen said that Sweden’s membership — on the back of Finland joining NATO last year — opened up “a new era in how we do defence cooperation in the Nordic region”.

“We’ve been working together for a long time, but the membership removes the rest of the hurdles,” he told AFP aboard a Norwegian coast guard ship.

Andersen said Sweden could now be fully plugged into NATO’s secure lines and its territory and capabilities put to the alliance’s use.    

READ ALSO: ‘Better late than sorry’ as Sweden joins Nato, and why we now have three years to learn Swedish

“But perhaps more importantly is that it’s only full membership of NATO that provides that mutual support within the Article 5 obligation on all sides,” he said.

US Vice Admiral Douglas Perry, who heads NATO’s Norfolk command that oversees the Atlantic and Arctic regions, said Sweden’s membership now meant it could be incorporated fully into the alliance’s new plans for a Russian attack.

“They bring a lot to the table,” Perry said, pointing to Sweden’s strategic location between the Artic and the Baltic Seas.

Sweden joins NATO at a time when fears of a possible conflict between the alliance and Russia have risen as Moscow’s forces push back Ukraine two years into the war there. 

Onboard the Swedish marine vessel, new recruit Vera Nylander leaned on a machine gun as she thought about the chances that exercises might one day become real combat.

“I’ll take it when and if it comes,” she said.

“I think we are ready, we are prepared for it and we are trained for it if it happened.”

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

MILITARY

Swedish parliament votes in favour of Defence Cooperation Agreement with the US

Swedish law-makers have signed off on the controversial Defence Cooperation Agreement (DCA) with the United States, despite critics saying it could lead to the deployment of nuclear weapons and permanent US bases in the country.

Swedish parliament votes in favour of Defence Cooperation Agreement with the US

The DCA is a major step for a nation that in March ended two centuries of military non-alliance to join Nato.

Signed by Stockholm and Washington in December, the deal gives the US access to 17 military bases and training areas in Sweden, and allows the storage of weapons, military equipment and ammunition.

The agreement was approved by a broad majority in parliament following an almost five-hour debate, with 266 MPs voting in favour and 37 against, while 46 were absent.

The main opponents, the Left and Green parties, had argued that the agreement ought to state outright that the Scandinavian country would not allow nuclear weapons on its territory.

READ ALSO:

“We want to see legislation that bans nuclear weapons from being brought onto Swedish soil,” Green Party MP Emma Berginger told parliament during Tuesday’s debate.

“Unfortunately, the government has chosen to sign an agreement that doesn’t close the door to nuclear weapons, and therefore the Green Party is going to vote no to this agreement,” she told said during the debate.

Manual widget for ML (class=”ml-manual-widget-container”)

Greens leader Daniel Helldén had argued on Monday that the agreement made Sweden “a target for nuclear weapons” since “we’re going to have 17 bases where the Americans can store (military) materiel”.

Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson’s centre-right minority government, propped up by the far-right Sweden Democrats, has said the deal respects Swedish sovereignty.

“It is very clear that Sweden is a sovereign nation, and there is no other country that can force Sweden to have nuclear weapons on Swedish soil,” Defence Minister Pål Jonson insisted.

‘Naive’

The Left and Green parties, which also voted against Sweden’s Nato membership, together hold just 42 seats in parliament, which was not enough to block the agreement’s adoption on their own.

The Swedish Peace and Arbitration Association, one of the biggest critics of the move, said two successive Swedish governments insisted during the Nato application process that Sweden would have the same stance on nuclear weapons as neighbouring Denmark and Norway.

“But unlike Norway’s and Denmark’s DCA agreements, there is no clause in Sweden’s agreement against nuclear weapons being brought into or placed in Sweden,” the association’s head Kerstin Bergeå wrote in an op-ed.

In addition, Finland, which joined Nato in April 2023, “has a national law prohibiting nuclear weapons on Finnish territory and Finland’s DCA agreement refers to this law”.

A similar Swedish clause would “strengthen the Nordic region and contribute to a joint de-escalation vis-a-vis Russian nuclear weapons”, Bergeå said.

Nukes in wartime?

Sweden’s prime minister made headlines last month when he opened the door for the possibility of nuclear weapons in the country during wartime.

“In a war situation it’s a completely different matter, (it) would depend entirely on what would happen,” Kristersson told public radio broadcaster SR.

Two Left Party MPs said in an op-ed on Sunday: “That’s an incredible statement and is totally the opposite of what the Swedish people think and what Sweden has long stood for.”

Bergeå questioned whether Sweden would be able to put a brake on the United States.

“An agreement based solely on confidence is not enough in important matters such as these,” she said.

Jonson, the defence minister, has said Sweden needed to strengthen its international cooperation “to defend our freedom and democracy”.

“With the DCA, Sweden can receive early, swift and effective military support from the United States in a deteriorating security situation,” he said last month.

“The agreement acts as a deterrent and is stabilising. It reduces the risk of war breaking out and makes Sweden safer,” Jonson said.

SHOW COMMENTS