SHARE
COPY LINK

TECH

Denmark to scrap use of Chinese camera equipment on roads

The Danish Roads Directorate (Vejdirektoratet) has decided to stop using road camera equipment sourced from China, citing cyber security.

Denmark to scrap use of Chinese camera equipment on roads
Hikvision and Dahua CCTV security surveillance cameras photographed in China in 2020. Photo: Thomas Peter/Reuters/Ritzau Scanpix

Motorists on Danish roads will not be filmed with any new camera equipment purchased from China, after the Danish Roads Directorate decided to replace equipment from Chinese company Hikvision.

The decision will give Danish authorities better cyber security in its road surveillance systems, the authority told media Altinget.

“The Danish Roads Directorate is currently reviewing our roadside equipment to ensure it complies with relevant guidelines from the Centre for Cybersecurity,” it stated.

Some 170 new cameras were purchased by the Danish Roads Directorate in late 2022 from Hikvision, the world’s biggest manufacturer of surveillance cameras.

The deal, which cost around 5 million kroner, was widely criticised with both security agencies and human rights organisations having previously voiced concerns about the company.

Hikvision cameras are among Chinese surveillance products already banned in the United States, which said they constitute an “unacceptable” national security risk.

The company has previously been linked to human rights abuses in China.

An expert in the area, Aalborg University’s Professor Jens Myrup Pedersen, told Altinget that Danish authorities were right to recognise potential security risks in the equipment.

“There can be a concern that these systems are created with back doors which you might not necessarily be aware of,” he said.

“That could mean the Chinese government, for example, might be able to access data if it found this interesting at some point,” he said.

The concerns are related to Chinese security laws which oblige private individuals and businesses in China to hand over data to authorities if asked to do so.

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

TECH

Danish court acquits Google in job website’s copyright case

Tech giant Google was on Tuesday acquitted by a trade court in Denmark in a case in which it had been accused of stealing content from a Danish jobs platform.

Danish court acquits Google in job website's copyright case

The interest organisation for Danish media companies, Danske Medier, had brought the case against Google on behalf of the Jobindex platform, suing it for breaching copyright, branding and marketing laws.

It demanded that Google admit breaking the law and pay damages of five million kroner to Jobindex.

The case relates to job notices posted on Jobindex, which Danske Medier argued were protected by copyright and therefore could not be published on other platforms, particularly for profit.

It claimed Google was breaching copyright and marketing laws by making job ads posted to Jobindex available on the Google for Jobs service without permission.

READ ALSO: Danish jobs website sues Google for using ads without permission

This meant that Google users were able to read Jobindex posts without accessing Jobindex.

However, the Danish trade court, Sø- og Handelsretten on Tuesday found that no copyright laws were infringed in the case.

Jobindex structures its data in a way that enables search engines – in this case Google – to show expanded search results, which in this case comprises the full job notices.

As such, Google’s search engine was showing information which had already been made publicly available by others, and was thereby not breaking copyright laws, the court found.

The court also stated that Google is not a direct competitor of Jobindex and did thereby not break rules related to branding and marketing.

Jobindex is now required to pay 1.7 million kroner in costs.

Google has this year faced criticism outside of Denmark from the publishing sector because of its new AI Overviews service.

Critics say the service, which uses AI to scrape existing media articles to give users a fully formed answer to a query without having to leave Google, breaks a contract because Google is using the intellectual property of media and publishers but no longer enabling website footfall and advertising revenue in return.

SHOW COMMENTS