SHARE
COPY LINK
For members

RESIDENCY PERMITS

Researchers’ long-term residency rejected over Swedish Migration Agency delay

Two researchers who were denied long-term residency status in Sweden argue they're being unjustly punished for the Migration Agency's history of long processing times.

Researchers' long-term residency rejected over Swedish Migration Agency delay
Mert Can Yilmaz and Berrak Pinar Uluer Yilmaz have lived in Sweden since 2017. Photo: Private

When Mert Can Yilmaz and his wife Berrak Pinar Uluer Yilmaz applied for long-term residency in Sweden this summer, they were convinced they would be successful.

They met all the legal requirements and had been living in Sweden since 2017 – with permits that would qualify them for long-term residency status for the past five years.

“We moved here for our master’s programmes. I did my master’s in bilingualism at Stockholm University and my husband peace and conflict research at Uppsala. Sweden was our dream study location,” explains Berrak, holding the couple’s five-month-old baby.

After graduating, Mert was immediately offered work by his department, so he changed his permit to a researcher permit and then later to a work permit, with Berrak as his spouse.

Technically, they both already qualify for permanent residency as they have lived in Sweden for more than three years, but you can only apply for that once your current permit is due to expire, which theirs won’t do until February next year.

So, concerned about changing permit rules under the Swedish government’s “migration paradigm shift”, they started looking for other options to secure their status in Sweden in the meantime.

“I was in touch with my union and they suggested that we could apply for long-term residency status instead of permanent, so we did that in July,” says Mert.

Based on an EU directive, long-term resident is a status that may be granted to non-EU citizens who have lived in Sweden for five years (temporary visits and studies at a lower level than doctoral research is not included) – a status that has become more attractive following Sweden’s tightening of permanent residency rules in recent years.

Mert and Berrak fully expected the Migration Agency to approve their application. Mert had been working continuously for Uppsala University since 2019, with a permanent contract since 2021. Berrak is doing a PhD, speaks advanced Swedish and has held several jobs, including teaching and research, with her current residency being linked to her husband’s permit.

But instead the decision came back: rejected.

To understand the reason, we have to go back to 2022, when Mert and Berrak applied to renew their residence permits. As The Local has previously reported, the Migration Agency has radically improved its processing times this year, but before that, many non-EU foreigners faced waits of several months, and in extreme cases years, to renew their permits.

That meant that in early 2022, the couple’s permits expired before the extension had been granted. This is not unique, and during this period you’re still allowed to live and work in Sweden, although it leaves the applicant in limbo and makes international travel difficult.

Mert and Berrak fortunately only had to wait 25 days to receive their permit extensions.

But those 25 days are a big reason for why they were rejected for long-term residency.

“The Migration Agency notes that you didn’t have a residence permit during the period January 31st 2022 to February 24th 2022,” reads Mert’s rejection letter.

“The Migration Agency makes the assessment that you haven’t been staying in Sweden continuously for at least five years with a residence permit or on another basis as legally resident in the past five years. For that reason you don’t fulfil the basic requirement of residency to be granted a status as long-term resident in Sweden,” it concludes.

For Berrak, there’s an additional period between December 2019 and July 2020 when she was in-between permits, as she was changing from a job-seeker to a spouse permit. But during that period too, she had a pending permit application with the Migration Agency.

Berrak Pinar Uluer Yilmaz shaking hands with Sweden’s King Carl XVI Gustaf. Photo: Magnus Fröderberg

The couple say they submitted their applications on time on all occasions.

“I was working for Uppsala University during this period, so I was even a state employee during the gap,” says Mert. “So I mean, it’s funny that they say we’re not legal, that we don’t have the right to stay. Or maybe we have the right to stay, but this right doesn’t count as a legal stay. But when paying taxes it’s pretty legal. I’ve paid my taxes every year.”

For Mert and Berrak, it’s a setback but not the end of the world. The rejection letter makes it clear that their current temporary permits remain valid, so they’re not at risk of deportation, and their plan is still to apply for permanent residency in February.

READ ALSO:

But they hope to use their case to raise awareness of the red tape international talent still faces in Sweden, despite the government’s pledges to attract high-skilled workers.

“We shouldn’t be punished for the Migration Agency’s unreasonably long processing times,” says Mert, adding that the cycle of renewing permits and never really knowing when a decision will come is taking its toll, making them feel like their and their son’s future in Sweden is always up in the air. “It’s making us think of moving somewhere else in the world where they welcome really high-skilled workers.”

They have appealed the rejection of their long-term residency, but the chances of a successful appeal are slim. Ruling on a separate case in June 2024, the Migration Supreme Court found that a similar gap between permits was not to be regarded as legal residency and thus did not contribute to the qualifying period for long-term residency.

The court stated that “each member state has the authority to determine what it means to be legally resident in its territory. The Swedish system means that even if a foreigner is allowed to stay in Sweden while a residence permit application is under review, it does not automatically mean that the applicant is to be considered legally resident during that time”.

Mert and Berrak say that although they’ve been made to feel welcome in Sweden in many other ways, never-ending migration bureaucracy constantly reminds them they’re strangers.

“We wanted to contribute to this society, that’s why we’ve been living here continuously. But Sweden is not giving back,” says Berrak.

“I learned Swedish and worked in Swedish schools and then I even attended a young leadership programme and got my certificate from the King. I shook hands with him and we made small talk and everything. What is Sweden expecting from immigrants?”

Member comments

  1. So sad, seems like Sweden is happy to welcome people who have no educational background, live off social benefits, join gangs and bring bad name to hard working tax paying immigrants and threaten the peace in the society but clearly has problems granting permit to skilled workers who do their best to integrate with the society. I mean, I love Sweden for all the good things here but similarly, the downsides should be accepted by Sweden and improved. After all, isn’t trust and honesty the base value(s) of the Swedish/Nordic culture?

  2. That is absolutely ridiculous. You aren’t able to apply to renew visas until one month before their expiry, and nobody is granted a new one the day of expiry. The wording of Migrationsverkets policy is that you cannot be granted a new visa until the prior visa is expired.

    How could anyone possibly be eligible for the EU-derived visa given this? Sweden needs to institute bridging visas for this situation.

  3. This whole thing seems to be a complete mess to me and it needs to get sorted. Sweden is in danger of losing good people who can contribute to the society. We already have read articles in the Local about the decline of skilled people moving away from Sweden. I am a Brit with a Swedish wife and a daughter who is living in Sweden but more importantly we have an ageing mother-in-law (Swedish) who we need to support I have made an application as a British citizen for a residency permit. With all the boxes ticked for supporting ourselves property ownership etc yet I have been waiting over 12 months and still haven’t even been assigned a case officer, I only discovered this recently when I tried to chase up my application, an application which was sent by post and recorded (but got no written acknowledgement of receipt). It seems that the organisation dealing with immigration and residency is either under resourced to an extreme level or grossly inefficient. I hope this couple get their application and they can continue to contribute to Sweden’s society and economy.

  4. I can verify that the process to live and work here is extremely difficult. I am a doctor, I was born here, to a Swedish Citizen mother, worked at Karolinska, am US trained, own my home. I think by law I am a citizen but have been rejected 5 times. When I qualified based on 5 years stay, they withdrew my Perm. Residency. During the pandemic. It is heartbreaking. I think it is much friendlier in other countries. It looks like both citizen. And PR have been denied once again.

  5. This is very shocking to know. I can understand the waiting period for the 1st work permit is not considered. But waiting period for extension not being considered is such a wrong thing to do. Majority of the people have to wait longer for extension and it is due to incapability of Migrationsvwerket and not our problems. How can they punish for their mistakes. This is very Alarming for people coming to sweden

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

IMMIGRATION

Sweden to pay refugees up to 350,000 kronor to return home

The Swedish government has pledged to pay refugees up to 350,000 kronor to return home, increasing the current grant by over 3,000 percent.

Sweden to pay refugees up to 350,000 kronor to return home

As of 2026, immigrants who voluntarily return to their home countries would be eligible to receive up to 350,000 Swedish kronor ($34,000), the right-wing government, which is propped up by the anti-immigration Sweden Democrats, said in a statement.

“We are in the midst of a paradigm shift in our migration policy,” Migration Minister Johan Forssell told reporters.

READ ALSO:

Currently, migrants returning home can receive a maximum of 10,000 kronor per adult, or 5,000 kronor per child, with a maximum of 40,000 kronor available per family.

The scheme is only available to refugees, quota refugees, people in need of subsidiary protection, on the grounds of exceptionally distressing circumstances, or family of these groups.

“The grant has been around since 1984, but it is relatively unknown, it is small and relatively few people use it,” Ludvig Aspling of the Sweden Democrats told reporters.

Aspling added that if more people were aware of the grant and its size was increased, more would likely accept the offer.

The announcement came despite a government-appointed probe last month advising against a significant increase in the amount of the grant, saying the expected effectiveness did not justify the potential costs.

Conservative Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson promised to counter immigration and crime after he came to power in 2022 with a minority coalition government propped up by the Sweden Democrats – which emerged as Sweden’s second-largest party with 20.5 percent in the general election.

SHOW COMMENTS