SHARE
COPY LINK
For members

ECONOMY

Swedish Riksbank chief expects to slash interest rate again this month

Sweden’s central bank chief Erik Thedéen predicts that the Riksbank will cut interest rates another three times this year, meaning the next one would come in just three weeks.

Swedish Riksbank chief expects to slash interest rate again this month
Erik Thedéen, president of the Swedish central bank, Riksbanken. Photo: Anna Tärnhuvud/SvD/TT

When the Riksbank last month lowered Sweden’s policy rate to 3.50 percent, it signalled that it could cut it another two or three times – a faster rate than previously advertised.

And it’s leaning towards three times, Thedéen said on Tuesday.

“It’s more likely that we’re going to make three cuts than two cuts,” he told an audience at Swedish mortgage bank and insurance company Länsförsäkringar.

“These decisions haven’t been obvious to us at the Riksbank. They’ve slowly grown when we’ve felt increased certainty about where we’re heading,” he said.

Some economists criticised the Riksbank for only lowering the policy rate by 0.25 percentage points in its last cut, rather than 0.50 percentage points in one go.

But Thedéen said it was crucial to proceed with caution to avoid getting caught off guard anew by the geopolitical instability and global economic turmoil of the past few years.

“It could happen that the world surprises us again,” he said.

Why is the policy rate important?

The policy rate is the central bank’s main monetary policy tool. It decides which rates Swedish banks can deposit in and borrow money from the Riksbank, which in turn affects the banks’ own interest rates on savings, loans and mortgages.

If bank interest rates are high, it’s expensive to borrow money, which means people spend less and as a result inflation drops.

Future policy rate decisions are scheduled for September 25th, November 7th and December 18th.

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

BANKING

Sweden jails former banking boss over ‘swindling’

A Swedish court on Tuesday sentenced the former chief executive of Swedish bank Swedbank to 15 months in prison for deceiving investors about the bank's links to a money laundering scandal.

Sweden jails former banking boss over 'swindling'

Birgitte Bonnesen was found guilty of “gross swindling”.

Her lawyer, Per Samuelsson, told Swedish news agency TT he was “in shock” over the conviction and would file an appeal.

The Svea Court of Appeal overturned a district court ruling from 2023, which had acquitted Bonnesen, and comes five years after the eruption of a money laundering scandal implicating Swedbank.

In 2019, Swedish public service broadcaster SVT alleged that at least 40 billion kronor (equivalent at the time to $4.4 billion) of suspicious and high-risk transactions had been channelled to Baltic countries, notably Estonia, from Swedbank accounts.

The revelations, which saw the bank’s share price tumble, led to Bonnesen being fired.

The following year, Sweden’s financial regulator fined the bank four billion kronor and warned it to follow anti-money laundering laws.

Prosecutors later charged Bonnesen, accusing her of “intentionally or by aggravated negligence” providing false or misleading information about the steps the bank had taken to prevent and detect suspected money laundering.

“The court concludes that the former CEO disseminated misleading statements in interviews with the Swedish newspaper Svenska Dagbladet and the Swedish news agency TT in connection to the bank’s release of its third quarterly report for 2018,” the court said in a statement.

“The statements conveyed the misleading message that there did not exist any suspicious money laundering links to the operations in Estonia of another bank,” it added.

Bonnesen’s comments were deemed to be “liable to influence the assessment of the Swedish bank from a financial point of view, and thereby cause a loss”, according to the court.

Prosecutors had also charged Bonnesen with revealing insider information by informing the bank’s main owners that the investigative documentary was coming.

However, the appeals court found that the information shared with the owners was not of “specific enough nature to be considered insider information”, it said in its ruling.

It – like the district court – therefore acquitted Bonnesen of the charge.

SHOW COMMENTS