SHARE
COPY LINK
For members

POLITICS

What you should know about Michel Barnier and how he’d like to change France

The EU’s former chief negotiator on Brexit Michel Barnier has been charged with forming “a unifying government in the service of the country” – but he will have to brace for difficult times ahead. Here's what he could change in France.

Michel Barnier
Michel Barnier. (Photo by Julien DE ROSA / AFP)

Two months after France’s snap parliamentary elections, President Emmanuel Macron has finally named Michel Barnier as Prime Minister.

After 60 days of political deadlock in France, Barnier, 73, who served as the European Union’s Brexit negotiator, becomes the oldest Prime Minister in the history of modern France, succeeding Gabriel Attal, who – at 35 – had been the youngest.

The veteran right-wing politician has held a collection of top jobs as minister, European Union commissioner and negotiator on Brexit during a half-century political career that has seen him tack further to the right in recent years – and his longevity earned him the ‘French Joe Biden’ epithet.

Macron has asked his new Prime Minister to, “form a unifying government in the service of the country”.

The president “made sure” to choose Barnier as he meets the conditions for providing stable governance and would receive the broadest support.

The former foreign minister and EU commissioner is “Macron-compatible” and would not be immediately voted out by parliament, an adviser to the president told AFP.

A minister in the outgoing government, who also asked not to be named, said he was “very popular with right-wing members of parliament without being an irritant on the left”.

In 2022, Barnier set his sights on the Elysée in the presidential elections, but missed out on the nomination for Les Republicains – and has been largely absent from most of the French political discourse ever since.

But his political views from two years ago are likely to guide his political direction now.

Barnier’s positions in 2022

As a candidate, he vowed to “be the president of a France that is reconciled, to respect the French people and have France respected”.

But he surprised some in the European Union by setting his stall out to the right of the political spectrum, calling for an ‘electric shock’ on security, a moratorium on immigration and for France to free itself from European court oversight, to the dismay of former colleagues in Brussels.

Barnier said he would organise a referendum if elected, asking voters to approve constitutional changes and the ability of parliament to set immigrant quotas each year.

He also proposed bringing back military service in a bid to woo conservative voters. France’s last conscripts were demobilised in 2001 after former president Jacques Chirac ended nearly a century of military service.

He declared, at the time, that he did not “really like the concept of European sovereignty”, and took aim at what he called “German dominance” the European Union. “I know what I’m talking about,” he said.

Barnier’s backstory

With a half century career behind him, Barnier who proudly extols his origins in the French Alps rather than Paris, first become a member of parliament aged just 27.

As well as two stints as an EU commissioner and handling the thorny negotiations on Britain’s exit from the bloc, Barnier served as a minister under the right-wing administrations of presidents Jacques Chirac and Nicolas Sarkozy.

He has had notably conservative positions on social issues.

In 1981 he voted against equalising the age of consent for gay men – attempting to block the repeal of a Vichy-era law that criminalised – via fine or jail time – consenting sexual relations between men aged 21 or under.

He also voted against the recognition of PACS (civil marriage), which was first proposed in 1990 and was intended to offer a similar regime to marriage for same-sex couples.

On the topic of abortion, which had already been decriminalised in 1975 but remained subject to fees, Barnier voted against allowing for the procedure to be reimbursed by the social security system. 

He also opposed the loi Gayssot, which passed in 1990 and created a punishment for racist, anti-Semitic and xenophobic acts. The law also made it an offence to downplay or deny the existence of crimes against humanity, such as the Holocaust.

Barnier also voted against the Loi Evin, which banned smoking in public places and placed restrictions on advertising tobacco and alcohol. 

Outside of France, Barnier is perhaps best known outside the EU for taking on the job of negotiating Britain’s exit from the European Union on behalf of the bloc in 2016.

His handling of the negotiations won widespread respect. He later wrote about his experience in his book My Secret Brexit Diary: A Glorious Illusion. 

Although the title made his position on the UK’s decision to walk away from the EU perfectly clear, he steered clear of salacious gossip.

“There is most definitely something wrong with the British system… every passing day shows that they have not realised the consequences of what is truly at stake,” he wrote.

How is he perceived?

Barnier’s first challenge after moving into Matignon will be facing down a likely no-confidence motion in parliament. Hard-left politicians have already claimed the appointment means that July’s election was ‘stolen’, after the left-wing NFP group’s preferred candidate was ignored – despite their success in the elections.

Even within his own political party, Barnier’s appointment to the Prime Ministerial hotseat has not been met with universal approval. One LR MP told AFP that he epitomised “everything the French don’t want”.

Macron appears to be counting on the far-right Rassemblement National (RN) of three-time presidential candidate Marine Le Pen not to block the appointment of Barnier. 

So far, Le Pen has said that support for the new Prime Minister would “depend on his programme”.

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

PARIS

Paris and Milan: Closest in the world to becoming ’15-minute cities’

Paris and Milan are among the cities closest to reaching the urban planning goal of being a "15-minute city," while car-dependent metropolises in the United States and elsewhere lag behind, a worldwide analysis said on Monday.

Paris and Milan: Closest in the world to becoming '15-minute cities'

In fact, the central areas of many cities already meet the definition of a 15 minute-city, which means that residents are within a quarter-hour walk or bike ride from everything they need to a lead a good life, the analysis found.

But even within a city, there are often stark differences between the wealthy inner cities and the urban sprawl on their outskirts, according to the Italian researchers behind the new study.

The concept of the 15-minute city gained traction during the Covid pandemic, when lockdowns put more focus on local neighbourhoods.

It has since been embraced by dozens of mayors around the world — and become the target of conspiracy theorists online.

For the new study, published in the journal Nature Cities, the researchers built an online database looking at roughly 10,000 cities globally.

They used open source data to map out how far of a walk or cycle residents were from different services, including shops, restaurants, education, exercise and healthcare.

“A lot of people already live in a 15-minute city,” study co-author Hygor Piaget Monteiro Melo told AFP.

But it depends on where you look within a city, he said, because of the inequality in access to services between the centre and periphery.

No ‘utopia’

What is clear, the researchers noted, is that population density is a crucial factor — if enough people are living close enough to each other, it is much easier for them to have easy access to services.

This meant that somewhat smaller yet relatively dense cities such as Italy’s Milan or Spain’s Barcelona scored well on their map, which was made available online.

When it came to the biggest cities, “Paris is an outlier,” lead study author Matteo Bruno told AFP.

The mayor of Paris embraced the concept in 2020, and a “considerable fraction” of the city is below the 15-minute mark, the study said.

Some European cities have a head start because they were built centuries ago at a time before cars — when basically all towns had to be 15-minute cities, the researchers said.

Cities built more recently with cars specifically in mind — particularly in the United States — fared far less well on the map.

Atlanta in particular stood out as being a long way from being a 15-minute city. Future Olympic host Los Angeles also lagged behind most others for walkability, as did several Chinese cities including Chongqing.

But when it comes to cities, there are always trade-offs — and there is no single right answer, the researchers said.

“The 15-minute city is often presented as a utopia — it’s not,” Bruno said.

Americans in sprawled-out cities usually have their own houses and backyards, while Europeans in densely populated cities tend to live in apartments, illustrating the important role played by culture, Bruno said.

And central parts of US cities such as New York, San Francisco and Milwaukee were under the 15-minute threshold.

“Manhattan is definitely one of the most 15-minute places ever in the world,” said Bruno, a researcher at Sony Computer Science Laboratories in Rome.

‘Conspiracy mongers’

There has been confusion about the concept in the past, the researchers lamented.

For example, “traffic has nothing to do with the 15-minute city,” Bruno said.

In fact, slow traffic could indicate an area is more pedestrian friendly, he added.

Yet it was new “low-traffic zones” in the UK that turned the ire of conspiracy theorists towards 15-minute city proponents.

Confusing the two ideas, online groups including vaccine and climate sceptics falsely claimed that 15-minute cities were part of a secret plot to restrict the movement of citizens.

The Italian researchers, who have themselves been targeted by “Twitter haters,” emphasised that nothing about the 15-minute city concept involves confining anyone.

Researcher Carlos Moreno, a high-profile proponent of 15-minute cities who has advised Paris Mayor Anne Hidalgo, was also “attacked by the worldwide conspiracy mongers,” he told AFP.

Moreno welcomed the new study, praising how the idea had swiftly become a topic of interest for researchers around the world.

Just last week, Valerie Pecresse, the right-wing head of the greater Paris Ile-de-France area, presented a plan for a 20-minute region, he pointed out.

Bruno said that the 15-minute metric is just one element in the “recipe” that makes a good city.

Other parts of the recipe include tackling inequality and segregation, improving public transport, reducing traffic and so on, he said.

SHOW COMMENTS