Read news from:
Austria
SHARE
COPY LINK

BREXIT

How our meeting with Jeremy Corbyn in Madrid led to a victory for Britons across the EU

British in Europe's Michael Harris explains how a fleeting visit to Madrid by Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn to meet campaigners helped pave the way for a crucial amendment being backed by MPs in the UK parliament that could lead to the futures of Britons in Spain being secured whatever happens with Brexit.

Published: 28 February 2019 09:35 CET
How our meeting with Jeremy Corbyn in Madrid led to a victory for Britons across the EU
Michael Harris (L) and other members from Eurocitizen with Jeremy Corbyn and his team. Photo: MHarris / Eurocitizens

Four Britons were sitting in a slick conference room on the 18th floor of Torre Espacio on an eerily sunny Friday afternoon.

Far below us cars crawled up the Castellana full of madrileños making an early getaway to the Sierra.

We huddled at one end of the baronial table and fingered our information packs for the Labour team: factsheets about Britons in Spain; weighty British in Europe reports about healthcare, no-deal contingency plans and pension coordination; and the ace in our pack, a letter from the3million and British in Europe asking for support for the Costa amendment to ring-fence citizens rights.

Jeremy Corbyn and his team swept in and sat amongst us, two shadow ministers, an aide plus audiovisual guys.

Introductions and first-name terms established, we got down to business.

We received approving nods when we explained our objectives, to defend British and Spanish immigrants affected by Brexit and to fight intolerance against migrants.

We outlined the profile of Britons in Europe, 80 percent are of working age or below (60 percent in Spain), and attacked the hackneyed stereotypes of well-off retirees sitting around pools drinking gin.

We plugged the Costa amendment relentlessly. We underlined its importance for both UKinEU and EUinUK citizens as the only way to end the uncertainty faced by citizens, as a no-deal Brexit becomes the default option.

Only an international treaty can give security to us and to EU citizens, given the Home Office's record. Corbyn replied that he was “very sympathetic”, was “completely behind us” and was “disgusted about how citizens have been used in the deal/no-deal tussle”. He would consult party whips and get back to us.   

We moved onto issues in the UK government's gift: the enshrining of EUinUK rights in primary legislation and its impact on reciprocity for us, automatic pensions uprating, home university fees, votes for life and the rights of returning Britons to bring back close family.

We then briefed Corbyn for his meeting with Sánchez. We explained the horror of a no deal and the impact of an end to S1 healthcare and social security coordination on UK pensioners in Spain.

The Labour team were genuinely shocked when we showed them harrowing case studies and Corbyn said that he was “committed to stopping a no deal”. Finally, we asked him to bring up with Sánchez the issue of dual nationality for Britons in Spain, a case where reciprocity is not at work.

The next day we were elated to receive an email confirming Labour support for the Costa amendment. On Wednesday evening the motion was passed unanimously in the Commons.

Now Theresa May has a mandate to go back to Brussels to propose, for once in her life, something simple, straightforward and agreed on by Parliament: to ring-fence our rights and to finally take citizens off the bargaining table. That should have been done two years ago, but better late than never.

Michael Harris is the chair of EuroCitizens and a steering group member of British in Europe.

READ ALSO:

Becoming Spanish: 'Brexit has made me more than happy to renounce my British passport'

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.
For members

GIBRALTAR

Why has Gibraltar still not reached a Brexit deal with Spain?

With yet another round of Spain-UK negotiations set to begin more than eight years since the Brexit referendum, Gibraltar is still without a deal and a November deadline looms over any treaty. Why has it proven so hard to break the deadlock?

Published: 17 September 2024 13:38 CEST
Why has Gibraltar still not reached a Brexit deal with Spain?

On Thursday September 19th, Spain and the UK resume talks on Gibraltar’s post-Brexit status, and has been the case since 2016, uncertainty is still the prevailing feeling.

The British Foreign Secretary David Lammy recently received his Spanish counterpart, José Manuel Albares in London. Both did their diplomatic duties and talked up the prospects of a deal, with Lammy stating he hoped for an agreement that would ensure greater “prosperity and security for the people of Gibraltar.”

Albares, for his part, understandably centred any hypothetical deal on a “shared prosperity between Gibraltar and the 300,000 Andalusians connected every day in their normal lives”.

READ ALSO: Gibraltar demands Spain return stolen concrete block in new diplomatic spat

Though Lammy and Albares discussed the Rock, no formal negotiations or deal can be struck without EU oversight, so the meeting also included discussion of bilateral issues and international concerns such as the wars in Ukraine and the Middle East.

The meeting between the two Ministers was therefore a preamble to yet more formal treaty negotiations in Brussels on Thursday. Since Brexit came into effect at the end of 2020, Gibraltar has essentially existed in legal limbo with no formal treaty.

Border controls have been fudged ever since, leaving locals and Spaniards across the border faced with inconsistent rules and forcing travellers to find creative ways to bypass rules and get over ‘La Línea’. 

Why hasn’t a deal been reached?

So why all the meetings and pre-meetings and endless rounds of negotiations? How is it possible that Gibraltar is still without a Brexit deal all these years later?

A recent piece in El País by Rafa de Miguel, the daily’s UK and Ireland correspondent, perhaps put it best: “The amount of warm words in any political statement is inversely proportional to the progress in the negotiations.”

The reality is that, however many handshakes and photo opportunities and positive attitudes expressed between Spain and the UK on a bilateral level, these are ultimately irrelevant as nothing can be signed without the EU’s approval. 

This is further complicated by the fact that this makes any deal dependent on four way negotiations between Spain, the UK, the EU, and Gibraltar.

Each of these parties has their own individual set of needs, preferences and motivations. The EU won’t want to be seen to give Gibraltar, and by extension the UK, any special treatment for fear of emboldening other member states who desire bespoke arrangements when it comes to border controls and customs checks.

In light of Germany recently reimplementing land border checks, something some say is a direct violation of Schengen rules, this will be especially sensitive in these latest rounds of negotiations. 

Spain has long made territorial claims on Gibraltar dating back to the 1713 Treaty of Utrecht, when the overseas territory was first ceded to the UK, and will want to come out of negotiations with something that can be perceived as a political victory, likely an increased Spanish role in border patrols.

Fabian Picardo, Gibraltar’s Chief Minister, has ruled this out definitively over the last few years, citing concerns about British sovereignty.

The UK government in London will also have worries about British sovereignty, but will balance this with the knowledge that Gibraltar negotiations are also an opportunity to reset relations with Europe more widely, something the new Starmer government has repeatedly stated since coming into power.

READ ALSO: ‘It’s time to reset Britain’s relations with Europe’, says UK foreign secretary

Some reports, however, suggest that despite the positive musings coming from London, negotiations have stalled and that Lammy has no intention of signing anything that would deviate from Gibraltar’s needs and concerns.

Political tensions were increased recently when Gibraltar demanded Spanish far-right party Vox return a concrete block stolen from British waters, and the Euro 2024 winning Spanish football team made international headlines when it celebrating by singing ‘Gibraltar es Español’ (Gibraltar is Spanish).

READ ALSO: ‘Gibraltar is Spanish!’: How Spain celebrated Euro 2024 heroes

Despite wanting to improve relations with the EU, Lammy is expected to reiterate the Labour government’s unwavering commitment to the “double lock” on sovereignty, sources told El País.

Perhaps most pressingly, however, is the fact that these new negotiations now have a deadline: the enforcement of new Schengen Area border rules come into force on November 10th and a treaty must be finalised before then. 

READ MORE: Hard border? What we know so far about new Gibraltar-Spain checks

Schengen Zone rules mean that there are two major outstanding points in treaty negotiations: firstly, the sore point of Spanish border guards on British soil, something Gibraltar rejects outright, and also the question of who would run Gibraltar’s airport, which is located on the isthmus between Spain and the British territory, an area Madrid claims was never included in Treaty of Utrecht.

The most contested aspect of negotiations is Madrid’s demand that Spanish agents should be allowed to carry out checks on passengers arriving at Gibraltar airport and that they should be armed and in uniform.

For many Llanitos (Gibraltar locals) this is an intolerable idea and one Picardo rejects outright: “There will be no Spanish boots on the ground,” he has said repeatedly.

On the other hand, Spain argues that no specific protocol can be designed for Gibraltar and that if it wants to join the border-free European area, it must accept Schengen rules.

Spanish boots on British soil is a particularly visceral point for many Gibraltarians of a certain age. In June 1969, Spanish dictator Francisco Franco closed the border gate between Gibraltar and La Línea de la Concepción, cutting the tiny overseas territory off from the world, separating Spanish-British families and forcing Gibraltar to source food from elsewhere on the planet. 

It was eventually reopened in December in 1982 but those 13 years have taken deep root in Gibraltar’s historical memory and is now embedded into the Llanito collective imagination and identity.

For many on ‘The Rock’, the idea of Spanish border guards on British soil, whether it be in the airport or elsewhere, is simply unacceptable under any circumstances. 

Tax could also prove to be a sticking point. Gibraltar has no VAT, but Madrid has argued that if it wants to benefit from fluid border movement, its tax rules must be brought into line with EU rules.

Of course, there’s also both the domestic and international geopolitical contexts to consider here too. All parties – Spain, the UK, Gibraltar and the EU – have been distracted by other events in recent years.

Spain has been preoccupied by political tension, snap elections and the Catalan amnesty, while Britain suffered the almost cartoonish political instability of the outgoing Conservative government and treaty talks were postponed after the general election in July.

Added to this is the fact that the mediating party, the EU, has had its hands full with the war in Ukraine and surging far-right parties across member states, a trend that interestingly both the UK and Spain buck as the only major European states with centre-left governments.

Talks resume on Thursday September 19th, over 8 years since the Brexit referendum.

In British politics, the UK’s exit from the EU now seems strangely absent from debate, as though the issue is over and the country has finally begun to move on — but for Gibraltarians and the thousands of Spaniards who cross the border and work there everyday, Brexit is still an open-ended question.

READ ALSO: ‘Starting now’: New UK govt wastes no time in Gibraltar post-Brexit talks with Spain

SHOW COMMENTS