SHARE
COPY LINK

IMMIGRATION

Will Switzerland vote to end EU migration?

On Saturday, Switzerland decide whether or not to restrict migration from EU countries. We asked three Swiss experts whether the vote will be successful.

Will Switzerland vote to end EU migration?
AFP

On September 27th, Swiss voters will go to the polls to vote on five separate questions. 

READ: What's at stake in Switzerland's five referendums on Sunday? 

The most controversial question is the right-wing Swiss People's Party initiative (SVP) which hopes to implement a cap on EU migration. 

The ‘moderate immigration limitation initiative' will restrict EU freedom of movement in Switzerland, although the exact specifics of the limitation remain unclear and will come as a result of negotiations with the EU should the referendum pass. 

READ: What will happen if Switzerland votes to limit EU immigration? 

What do the polls say? 

Despite early indications that the vote was likely to pass – especially during the heights of the pandemic – current polling suggests that it will be defeated

READ: How Switzerland avoided a coronavirus 'catastrophe' by protecting cross-border workers 

The support for the plan has failed to go beyond the SVP's base in the Swiss populace. 

Around two thirds (65 percent) reject the proposal, while 33 percent are in favour. Support for the vote is strongest in Ticino, where 45 percent of voters are in favour.

What do the experts say? 

The Local Switzerland interviewed three experts to discuss the vote. 

On the likelihood of it passing, each was in agreement that it was unlikely – but not impossible – that the vote would pass. 

Michael Siegenthaler, a Labour market specialist at KOF Swiss Economic Institute in Zurich, said few parallels could be drawn with the SVP’s previous effort to restrict migration in 2014. 

“I think the last polls on the vote were relatively clear, and in that sense relatively comforting for most people that it won’t pass,” Siegenthaler told The Local. 

“It’s a bit different to the vote in 2014. The polls were for the acceptance of the referendum before. 

“Here, the polls seem to suggest it’s pretty clear. I’m pretty sure that there was kind of a relief (for many in government) when the first polls came out.”

Unlike the SVP, the remaining Swiss mainstream political parties – along with the government itself – is opposed to the referendum. 

‘Not even the SVP think it will pass’

Sean Müller, an Assistant Professor at the University of Lausanne who specialises in Swiss and comparative federalism, territorial politics and direct democracy, said that the vote was unlikely to pass. 

“I don’t think it will pass for several reasons. I think they will have something like 40-45% approving (the vote),” Müller told The Local. 

“One reason is that the SVP has 25% to 28% of the vote normally, getting to 45% is still a success in reaching beyond their core electorate – but they won’t have a majority.”

Martina Mousson, from political research agency GFS Bern, agrees. 

“The polls show there is not a lot of support for the initiative outside the SVP’s (core demographic). People who have strong feelings for the party, they have strong feelings for the initiative,” Mousson told The Local. 

“But we are pretty sure it is going to be a no. We dont see any pressure on the initiative at the moment, unlike in 2014.”

Müller that even the SVP were likely to be sceptical of its chances. 

“I don’t think the SVP really believe the referendum will pass. The real success they had was in 2014 when they launched an initiative against mass immigration and it passed. Everyone predicted a ‘no’ and yet it passed – so it was a surprise for observers, but it was also a surprise for the SVP.”

Why will the vote fail?

Müller told The Local that the specificity of the vote was likely to be its downfall. 

“One of the reasons it passed in 2014 was because it was very vague. It said we should introduce quotas on migration, but it didn’t say how high the quota could be. So (voters) could signal that they were unhappy with the government while not doing anything concrete.”

“But by being so specific now, they have cut out the protest vote. The SVP will lose a lot of votes because they are so precise.”

Another vote looms likely even if the referendum is defeated

Michael Siegenthaler, a Labour market specialist at KOF Swiss Economic Institute in Zurich told The Local that even if the vote failed, it was unlikely to be the end of the issue from the point of view of the SVP. 

“It’s not unlikely that something similar would happen again,” he said. 

READ: What’s at stake on September 27th?

“I mean it's speculation but probably yes. If you really look at it, it states in our constitution that we (are to) regulate immigration by ourselves. 

“The referendum that was accepted in 2014 said that we have to regulate immigration independently of the EU. Everyone is aware of that, obviously, that we didn’t fully implement the 2014 initiative.”

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

IMMIGRATION

‘Shift to the right’: How European nations are tightening migration policies

The success of far-right parties in elections in key European countries is prompting even centrist and left-wing governments to tighten policies on migration, creating cracks in unity and sparking concern among activists.

'Shift to the right': How European nations are tightening migration policies

With the German far right coming out on top in two state elections earlier this month, the socialist-led national Berlin government has reimposed border controls on Western frontiers that are supposed to see freedom of movement in the European Union’s Schengen zone.

The Netherlands government, which includes the party of Dutch far-right leader Geert Wilders, announced on Wednesday that it had requested from Brussels an opt-out from EU rules on asylum, with Prime Minister Dick Schoof declaring that there was an asylum “crisis”.

Meanwhile, new British Prime Minister Keir Starmer of the left-wing Labour Party paid a visit to Rome for talks with Italian counterpart Georgia Meloni, whose party has neo-fascist roots, to discuss the strategies used by Italy in seeking to reduce migration.

Far-right parties performed strongly in June European elections, coming out on top in France, prompting President Emmanuel Macron to call snap elections which resulted in right-winger Michel Barnier, who has previously called for a moratorium on migration, being named prime minister.

We are witnessing the “continuation of a rightward shift in migration policies in the European Union,” said Jerome Vignon, migration advisor at the Jacques Delors Institute think-tank.

It reflected the rise of far-right parties in the European elections in June, and more recently in the two regional elections in Germany, he said, referring to a “quite clearly protectionist and conservative trend”.

Strong message

“Anti-immigration positions that were previously the preserve of the extreme right are now contaminating centre-right parties, even centre-left parties like the Social Democrats” in Germany, added Florian Trauner, a migration specialist at the Vrije Universiteit Brussel, the Dutch-speaking university in Brussels.

While the Labour government in London has ditched its right-wing Conservative predecessor administration’s plan to send asylum seekers to Rwanda, there is clearly interest in a deal Italy has struck with Albania to detain and process migrants there.

Within the European Union, Cyprus has suspended the processing of asylum applications from Syrian applicants, while laws have appeared authorising pushbacks at the border in Finland and Lithuania.

Under the pretext of dealing with “emergency” or “crisis” situations, the list of exemptions and deviations from the common rules defined by the European Union continues to grow.

All this flies in the face of the new EU migration pact, agreed only in May and coming into force in 2026.

In the wake of deadly attacks in Mannheim and most recently Solingen blamed on radical Islamists, German Chancellor Olaf Scholz’s government also expelled 28 Afghans back to their home country for the first time since the Taliban takeover of Kabul.

Such gestures from Germany are all the more symbolic given how the country since World War II has tried to turn itself into a model of integration, taking in a million refugees, mainly Syrians in 2015-2016 and then more than a million Ukrainian exiles since the Russian invasion.

Germany is sending a “strong message” to its own public as well as to its European partners, said Trauner.

The migratory pressure “remains significant” with more than 500,000 asylum applications registered in the European Union for the first six months of the year, he said.

‘Climate on impunity’

Germany, which received about a quarter of them alone, criticises the countries of southern Europe for allowing migrants to circulate without processing their asylum applications, but southern states denounce a lack of solidarity of the rest of Europe.

The moves by Germany were condemned by EU allies including Greece and Poland, but Scholz received the perhaps unwelcome accolade of praise from Hungarian right-wing Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Moscow’s closest friend in the European Union, when he declared “welcome to the club”.

The EU Commission’s failure to hold countries to account “only fosters a climate of impunity where unilateral migration policies and practices can proliferate,” said Adriana Tidona, Amnesty International’s Migration Researcher.

But behind the rhetoric, all European states are also aware of the crucial role played by migrants in keeping sectors going including transport and healthcare, as well as the importance of attracting skilled labour.

“Behind the symbolic speeches, European leaders, particularly German ones, remain pragmatic: border controls are targeted,” said Sophie Meiners, a migration researcher with the German Council on Foreign Relations.

Even Meloni’s government has allowed the entry into Italy of 452,000 foreign workers for the period 2023-2025.

“In parallel to this kind of new restrictive measures, they know they need to address skilled labour needs,” she said.

SHOW COMMENTS