SHARE
COPY LINK
For members

POLITICS

What would a second Trump presidency mean for Germany?

As German media turns its focus increasingly on the US Presidential election, The Local takes a look at what exactly a second Trump term could mean for Germany.

Trump on stage
Former US President and 2024 presidential nominee Donald Trump gestures after speaking during a campaign rally with US Senator and vice presidential nominee J.D. Vance. (Photo by Jim WATSON / AFP)

As with major media outlets around the globe, the German media is currently obsessed with the US presidential election.

A glance at the front page of Germany’s leading news outlets on Monday July 22nd reveals that US President Joe Biden’s decision to drop out of the next presidential election is the biggest news of the day, even in Germany.

At time of writing, the top stories on virtually every German news website are about Biden, Vice President Kamala Harris and the US election.

While Biden and Harris have stolen the spotlight for now, perhaps no US character has dominated the German media landscape in recent history quite like former President Donald Trump. Even as of 2021 (following the last election cycle) Trump had been featured on the cover of Der Spiegel, Germany’s best-selling weekly news magazine, 28 times.

More recently, Trump’s presidential election bid has brought him back to Spiegel’s focus. On the cover of the latest issue, published July 20th 2024, a red baseball cap is seen with a splotch of blood dripping off the side – a dramatic visual reference to the assassination attempt that resulted in an injury to Trump’s ear.

But Germany’s nervous obsession with US politics is not without reason. It is widely understood that the US’ next choice of president will have a direct impact on Europe, specifically around international security and trade issues, and Germany in particular is positioned to be strongly impacted.

Here’s a look at how a second Trump term could affect Germany.

Security

Perhaps the most immediate threat to Germany, should Trump take the helm in the US for a second term, is an emboldened Russia at Europe’s doorstep.

Trump’s admiration for Russian President Vladimir Putin is well-known. Shortly after Putin began his invasion of Ukraine, Trump reportedly called the move “genius” and “savvy”.

Trump Putin handshake

US President Donald Trump (R) attends a meeting with Russia’s President Vladimir Putin during the G20 summit. (Photo by Brendan Smialowski / AFP)

More recently, Trump has criticised the Biden administration for supporting Ukraine with billions in weapons and defence funding. According to reporting by Reuters, Trump’s top advisers have devised a plan to cease weapons deliveries to Ukraine unless the country engages in “peace” talks with Russia.

German top officials, however, are wary of letting Russia achieve victory in Ukraine – fearing that an emboldened Russia is more likely to take its chances pushing further into other European countries.

German defence minister Boris Pistorius has previously warned that Russia may attack a NATO country within “five to eight years”. 

READ ALSO: What a Russian victory in Ukraine would mean for Germany

Additionally, NATO itself is threatened by another Trump presidency. Trump has long been critical of the treaty, claiming that the US bears an outsized burden of its cost.

At a campaign rally this year, speaking about NATO countries who have not met suggested defence spending levels, Trump said: “I would not protect you. In fact, I would encourage them (Russia) to do whatever the hell they want”.

Trump’s recently appointed running mate, J.D. Vance, echoed this sentiment in a recent op-ed published by Financial Times, in which he said that Germany relies on “borrowed military strength”.

Germany is among the NATO countries that has not maintained a defence budget equal to two percent of its national GDP until recent years. In an effort to hit that target, Germany recently allocated a ‘Bundeswehr special fund’ to bolster its defence budget. But significant budget gaps remain.

READ ALSO: How can Germany meet NATO’s two percent defence spending target?

Earlier this month US President Biden and Chancellor Scholz announced a plan to station longer-range US missile systems in Germany. This can be seen, at least in part, as a move meant to bring the US and Germany closer together ahead of a possible Trump presidency.

Trade

Beyond security issues, the US presidential election will be a pivotal moment for the global economy, and for US and European trade relations.

Trump’s ‘America-first’ trade policy is based on import tariffs, which could be expected to increase in a tit-for-tat fashion, pushing the US into a potential trade war with the EU that would also impact the German economy.

Trump’s current plan involves a 10 percent tariff on worldwide imports to the US, and further tariffs from 60 percent or more on all imports from China.

The German Economic Institute (IW) has estimated that these proposed tariffs, combined with Chinese counter-tariffs would cost Germany €150 billion by 2028, which would be enough to cut the country’s annual economic growth by 1.4 percent of GDP and likely bring an economic depression. 

The Economist Intelligence Unit analysed which countries faced the highest risk in the event of a second Trump term, creating a Trump Risk Index (TRI).

According to the TRI, close US partners would be among the most affected, with Germany scoring 3rd highest for overall risk, behind Mexico and Costa Rica.

The report notes that “Germany and Ireland are assessed to be the most exposed geographies in Europe” for negative trade impacts. This is primarily because Germany maintains a high trade surplus with the US, which would likely take a significant hit following the increase of import tariffs there.

Climate

Anyone familiar with Trump’s rhetoric should not be surprised that he and Vance referred to climate change as the “green new scam” in recent speeches, and suggested that prosperity in the US requires more fossil fuel development.

“We have more liquid gold under our feet than any other country by far. We are a nation that has the opportunity to make an absolute fortune with its energy,” Trump said in a speech at the Republican National Convention, disregarding the fact that damages due to climate change are already projected to cost $38 trillion (€35 trillion) a year globally by 2050.

While the President of the US doesn’t have the authority to directly interfere with Germany’s own climate policy, another Trump term would be a catastrophic step backward for US climate policy, which would ultimately add to the intensifying climate effects already being felt in Germany.

Fuelling far-right aspirations

Trump’s fans in Germany tend to be from far-right, populist parties. For example, AfD party leader Alice Wiedel recently said she was keeping her fingers crossed for Trump on a ZDF tv show.

Wiedel cited Trump’s promise to end financial support to Ukraine as her main reason for siding with him. 

BLM protest in Berlin

A protester outside the US Embassy holds a sign reading “No Trump, no KKK, no racist USA” during a demonstration in connection with the death of George Floyd on May 30, 2020. In Berlin, as in the US, Trump’s opponents see him as a symbol of far-right, fascist ideologies. (Photo by Odd ANDERSEN / AFP)

But Trump’s platform has a number of similarities to Europe’s far-right parties, and there is reason to believe that a Trump victory across the Atlantic could bolster support for the AfD or other alt-right parties in Germany. 

In a recent interview, Club of Rome co-President Sandrine Dixson-Declève told The Local that the more right wing governments take power, the more they feel emboldened to step toward authoritarianism.

READ ALSO: INTERVIEW – ‘Failed climate policies are fuelling far-right politics in Germany’

Of populist politicians and upcoming elections in Europe Dixson-Declève said, “They talk like Trump. They walk like Trump…It’s absolutely fundamental to vote, so that we don’t slide to the right across Europe.”

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.
For members

IMMIGRATION

Which countries have an immigration deal with Germany?

In a move to encourage skilled immigration into the country, Germany has signed two new migration pacts with Kenya and Uzbekistan. Which countries have similar deals with Germany - and what do they mean?

Which countries have an immigration deal with Germany?

Germany’s urgent search for skilled workers is well known – and over the past few years, the government has been throwing everything at the problem. 

One of the most notable attempts to tackle labour shortages is the Skilled Worker Immigration Law, which came into force in phases in 2023 and 2024. Among other things, this new law loosened the salary requirements for Blue Card holders, created a new points-based visa for jobseekers, relaxed rules for international students and paved the way for easier family reunification.

With so many big changes coming into force with the Skilled Worker Law, far less attention has been paid to a series of pacts that the government has been signing with non-EU countries around the world.

Nevertheless, these deals are a cornerstone of the government’s attempts to get young, qualified workers into the country, and they’re likely to have a significant impact on immigration to Germany in the coming years. 

READ ALSO: 8 things to know about Germany’s new skilled worker immigration law

Who currently has an immigration deal with Germany? 

Back in December 2022, German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock signed the first of its new immigration deals with India, paving the way for easier mobility between the two countries.

It was the outcome of several months of intensive negotiations and covered employment for skilled workers in both the scientific and cultural sector, as well as students and trainees. 

At the time, around 200,000 Indians were living in Germany, including around 34,000 international students. By the end of 2023, this had shot up to 246,000, suggesting that the migration deal was already having a profound impact.

READ ALSO: ‘Germany needs you’ – Labour Minister’s plea to skilled workers from India 

The next migration deal was concluded in December 2023 with Georgia – a country that is currently applying for EU membership. At the same time, the eastern European country was reclassfied as a safe country of origin, meaning asylum applications from Georgia would be generally denied. 

Previously, around 15 percent of rejected asylum applications in Germany had come from Georgia and Moldova – a number that dropped significantly after the new deal was announced. As with India, the aim of the deal was to improve routes for skilled migration, though with a population of just 3.7 million, Georgia is a far smaller country.

William Ruto Olaf Scholz

German Chancellor Olaf Scholz (R) and Kenya’s President William Ruto shake hands at the end of a joint press conference. Photo: Tobias SCHWARZ/AFP.

At the start of 2024 came the next two deals with Morocco and Colombia, deepening Germany’s ties with the populous African and Latin American countries. In a visit to Morocco in January, Interior Minister Nancy Faeser (SPD) pledged to work more closely with her Moroccan counterparts on migration and other domestic issues.

The Colombia deal also reflects Germany’s recent attempts to woo young people in Latin American countries to bring their qualifications and expertise to Europe’s largest economy. Back in June 2023, Labour Minister Hubertus Heil (SPD) signed a “declaration of intent” with Brazil “to promote the mutual exchange of skilled workers”.

READ ALSO: How Germany is partnering with Brazil to recruit more skilled workers

Though this stopped short of a full migration pact, the aim was to encourage some of the 2.5 million qualified nurses in Brazil to come and work in Germany’s struggling care and health sectors. 

Most recently, this September, two further deals were concluded with Kenya and Uzbekistan. Celebrating the Kenya deal, Chancellor Olaf Scholz pointed to the fact that the country has “an unbelievable amount of IT expertise” within the population: an area of the workforce that Germany is desperate to strengthen.

According to the Interior Ministry, Germany is currently in the process of thrashing out additional deals with Ghana, Kyrgyzstan and the Philippines. An upcoming migration pact with Moldova has already been largely implemented.

What do the migration pacts say?

Though each of the migration agreements has its own regional inflections, all of them broadly cover two main objectives: encouraging skilled workers, students and trainees to come to Germany, and helping the government send back those who are living here illegally.

When it comes to the former, this involves offering fresh routes for people from those countries to find skilled employment or a placement for studies or vocational training in Germany. Many of the countries Germany has deals with have younger populations with higher unemployment rates. 

With the latter, Germany’s partner countries generally agree to loosen up their rules for accepting illegal migrants back into the country, as well as helping identify who might be in Germany without a permit.

In the case of the Kenya deal, for example, the Interior Ministry noted that Kenya was the first country south of the Sahara to agree to help identify irregular migrants through biometric data. Additionally, the Kenyan government has agreed to accept expired passports and ID cards to make it easier for Kenyans who have been in Germany for several years illegally to return home. 

READ ALSO: Germany and Kenya strike labour migration deal

Speaking to regional media outlet BR24, migration researcher David Kipp said it would take time for Germany to see the positive effects of the new pacts. However, Kipp believes that they could play an important role in Germany’s efforts to combat its labour shortages.

In the case of India – the earliest of the recent migrations pacts – the fact that around 50,000 Indian citizens came to Germany within the first year alone demonstrates the country’s pull for skilled migrants, Kipp added.

However, the researcher believes that other deals – such as those between the EU and Egypt and Tunisia – are likely to have a larger impact on curbing irregular migration. That said, these deals have been criticised for encouraging human rights abuses, such as Tunisia’s recent “pushbacks” of irregular migrants into the surrounding desert. 

SHOW COMMENTS