SHARE
COPY LINK

CULTURE

Right-wing ‘Schnitzel bonus’ rewards ‘traditional’ Austrian eateries

Staples of Austrian cooking such as schnitzel, roast pork lung and boiled beef have proved particularly vital for Gasthaus Stich, a restaurant in the village of Pfoesing, in rural Austria.

Right-wing 'Schnitzel bonus' rewards 'traditional' Austrian eateries
Gastronomer Hermann Stich poses at his inn 'Gasthaus Stich' in Pfoesing, Weinviertel, Lower Austria, north of Vienna, on July 2, 2024. - (Photo by Alex HALADA / AFP)

They have helped the struggling business to survive by earning it a subsidy from right-wing state authorities in a controversial programme that benefits only traditional Austrian cuisine.

The subsidy for restaurants that serve regional and “traditional food” has been derided in the media and by opposition parties as a “Schnitzel bonus”.

It excludes restaurants serving less overtly authentic Austrian fare, such as kebabs or pizza, for example.

As a typical Austrian staple, schnitzel — a boneless piece of meat that has been pounded thin to make it more tender and then coated and fried — qualifies for the cash.

“They gave us €10,000,” or $ 11,000, said Michael Stich, the 39-year-old owner of the family business in Pfoesing, population 300, in the state of Lower Austria.

The village’s last surviving restaurant is an institution, “like the church, town hall or fire station”, he told AFP.

“If this place didn’t exist, it would be difficult for the entire community.”

Austria’s conservative Chancellor Karl Nehammer has said he wants to defend the country’s “Leitkultur,” or “dominant culture”, as he seeks to bolster support ahead of September elections.

Campaigning on an anti-immigration platform, he has evoked the concept, born in Germany in the 1990s, as polls indicate the far right will come out on top for the first time in the Alpine nation.

‘Discriminatory’ 

Lower Austria — governed by the conservatives and the far right — introduced the “Schnitzel bonus” this year for owners who open a restaurant in a town without one or take over an existing one.

“The subsidy was very important for us,” said Michael Stich’s father, Hermann Stich, 62.

He continues to help out after his son became the third generation to run the business at the beginning of the year.

As he taps beer served over a large wooden counter, he notes the impact of energy and labour costs on the restaurant, which sports hunting antlers and a crucifix on the walls.

Since 2000, one in three restaurants in the state of Lower Austria, around Vienna, have closed, partly due to a rural exodus, with the coronavirus pandemic and resulting lockdown also taking their toll.

So far, 20 restaurants have received the bonus.

But critics have denounced the measure as discriminatory — an accusation rejected by the conservative People’s Party (OeVP) state parliament member Kurt Hackl.

“Village restaurants in Lower Austria are dying out, and we want to support them,” he said, calling them “special”.

Kitchen chef Eva Leimer poses with a plate of prepared Schnitzel meat at the inn ‘Gasthaus Stich’ in Pfoesing, Weinviertel, Lower Austria, north of Vienna, on July 2, 2024. (Photo by Alex HALADA / AFP)

‘Our values’ 

At Gasthaus Stich — which also features regional wines and seasonal dishes such as chanterelles with dumplings — clubs from the community regularly hold their meetings there, and guests play cards on wooden tables.

“In small communities, the tavern is the centre of social life. People celebrate, laugh and cry there together,” said Oliver Fritz at the Austrian Institute of Economic Research (WIFO).

However, Fritz considers the €10,000 subsidy as just a “drop in the ocean”.

He also warns of possible “windfall effects” for restaurant owners who do not really require the support.

He also questioned why restaurants that offer pizza or kebabs should be excluded.

“The social function works even if it is an Italian restaurant,” he told AFP.

“If demand evolves and younger generations prefer to eat something else, then it’s better to adjust because countering a trend is extremely difficult,” he said.

Meanwhile, at the national level, Nehammer has tasked his integration minister with defining what “Leitkultur” means for the country of nine million people, which like the rest of the EU has seen an influx of migrants and asylum seekers.

Under his “plan for Austria” launched early this year, Nehammer said that “Anyone who wants to live permanently in Austria must represent our values, accept our culture and adapt to our way of life”.

Member comments

Log in here to leave a comment.
Become a Member to leave a comment.

POLITICS

Why 1.5 million people can’t vote in Austria’s crucial federal election

Almost one in five people in Austria won’t have a say in the upcoming election, mainly due to the country’s restrictive citizenship laws.

Why 1.5 million people can't vote in Austria's crucial federal election

As Austria prepares for its upcoming National Council elections on September 29th, nearly 1.5 million people living in the country will be unable to participate despite being of voting age, Austrian media has reported.

This group, which represents around 19 percent of the population aged 16 and over, is largely composed of residents who do not hold Austrian citizenship.

While Austria has some of the most restrictive citizenship laws in the world, the election will still see some new eligible voters—particularly descendants of Nazi regime victims—casting their ballots for the first time, thanks to a 2019 amendment to the citizenship law that made the naturalisation process less restrictive for these cases. Among them is British actor Stephen Fry, whose grandmother fled Austria to escape Nazi persecution.

READ ALSO: Austria improves nationality law for descendants of Nazi victims

Over the past two decades, the number of residents not eligible to vote has more than doubled, from around 9 percent in 2002 to 19 percent today. Of the 1.5 million residents unable to vote, about half are citizens of other EU countries. While they are allowed to vote in EU elections, they are excluded from Austria’s national elections.

This growing number of non-voters contrasts with the shrinking pool of eligible voters. Despite having around 6.3 million eligible voters, Austria’s stringent naturalisation process means that only a small fraction of its long-term foreign residents can (or want to) attain citizenship and the right to vote.

READ ALSO: What makes Austrian citizenship so hard to get?

Who is eligible for citizenship in Austria?

Currently in Austria, if someone wants to take up citizenship via naturalisation they have to undergo an extensive and expensive process and fulfil specific criteria.

Generally, there needs to be at least 10 years of lawful and uninterrupted residence in Austria. But there are exceptions for those with citizenship of an EU or EEA country, those born in Austria, or married to an Austrian, for example.

The main hurdles, however, include having to give up any other citizenships, as Austria doesn’t allow dual citizenship in naturalisation cases with few exceptions, and paying a high fee, which depends on the municipality.

What’s at stake?

The elections will determine the composition of the National Council, Austria’s parliament. The far-right Freedom Party (FPÖ) is currently leading in the polls, followed by the centre-right Austrian People’s Party (ÖVP). The results could significantly change the country’s political landscape.

While many are still unable to vote, Austria’s decision to grant citizenship to descendants of Nazi regime victims has (slightly) expanded the voter base. 

Under this provision, around 27,800 people, mostly living abroad, have regained Austrian citizenship. The Foreign Ministry has encouraged these new citizens to participate in the elections.

SHOW COMMENTS